Talk:Masaru Emoto
Template:Old AfD multi Script error: No such module "Message box".
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Masaru Emoto Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
- REDIRECT Template:Archives
Template:Rcat shell User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Masaru Emoto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130602043746/http://www.beyondword.com/authors/Dr._Masaru_Emoto to http://www.beyondword.com/authors/Dr._Masaru_Emoto
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Scientific facts vs personal opinions
Hi guys
Sorry, I have to wonder, is there anyone behind you, or it's really the way you think? Anyway, what about a chance to just report unbiased facts, rather than personal and unfounded opinions? Humanity welcomes! Cheers! Cmcordova (talk) 02:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- - see the section Masaru Emoto#Scientific criticism and the article Pseudoscience - Epinoia (talk) 02:57, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Article does not include available supporting experiment from PubMed
In order to be more balanced, this article should note the double blind experiment found on PubMed: reference: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16979104/
DLPELF (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Coauthored by the subject, this may well fail wp:sps.Slatersteven (talk) 17:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Article does not include available supporting experiment from PubMed
Hello, In reading the biased current Wiki article, I felt compelled to look elsewhere to see if Mr. Emoto's theories had been more thoroughly tested elsewhere and I found this on Pubmed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16979104/ which somewhat supports his hypothesis. In order to present a more balanced view, it should be provided as a source, as well. DLPELF (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)reference: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16979104/
- Coauthored by the subject, this may well fail wp:sps..Slatersteven (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Also, Wikipedia doesn't do WP:FALSEBALANCE. --Hob Gadling (talk) 18:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Article is incorrect re: OIUAM shut down
Article here dated March 2023 proves the OIUAM is still operational despite being unaccredited by the India government. 2605:59C8:6EB:C010:700B:ADEE:DFF:1638 (talk) 08:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- That was in march last year. Slatersteven (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)