Talk:Marxism
Script error: No such module "Message box".
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marxism Script error: No such module "pagetype".. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:If in category Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Backwardscopy Template:Annual readership Template:Section sizes User:MiszaBot/config Template:Broken anchors
Revolutionary marxism
Is there a need to create a section on Revolutionary Marxism or does it already exist somewhere else and I can't find it? Pallikari ap' ta Sfakia 17:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't Marxism culminate in revolution by its very nature? Doesn't Marx postulate that revolution is the natural outgrowth of class conflict, class consciousness of the proletariat, and the eventual desire of the proletariat to capture ownership of their own means of production, an ownership the bourgeoisie will never hand over willingly? Isn't Revolutionary Marxism redundant? Kelelain (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Terrible
You keep talking around the subject and never explain it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.240.42 (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Aracialism isn't necessarily South-African or Marxist but the main article isn't analytical enough.
create the pages: ideological aracialism, ideological statelessness (chosen, [usually] not because of the circumstances), ethnocultural nonconformity
@Frost seems to feel that linking to Welfare spending is more appropriate than linking to Welfare. On the surface I don't see it but I'd be open to hearing their reasoning. Simonm223 (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I know Welfare is pointing to a disambiguation link but I don't think Welfare spending is the right target. Suggest Social services instead? Simonm223 (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- The link was originally pointing to the same article, which was moved in September. The disambiguation page then took over the article's previous title per this RM. My update was to reflect this change. Frost 17:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)