Talk:Maria Theresa
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Maria Theresa Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "English variant notice". User:MiszaBot/config Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Slow edit war on the infobox pic
Template:Ping, Template:Ping this seems to have been going on for a while. I don’t have much of a view either way although *I think* the painting by Meytens is the status quo. So consensus is required to change it. Would you both sort it out here please rather than through reverting and edit summaries?. DeCausa (talk) 07:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with the Meytens one - it’s been the long standing image. Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- But do you have any other reason why it’s better? Just because it’s the longstanding image isn’t really a reason to keep it. DeCausa (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
It’s also the image most frequently used in her biographies and portrayals of her - Gryffindor is using a low quality image with a ridiculously long caption. Dancingtudorqueen (talk) 02:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. And Gryffindor continues to try to insert their preferred image with no adequate explanation. DeCausa (talk) 23:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
You cannot remove referenced information without proper cause WP:REMOVAL. None of which you are giving so far. The image you keep on inserting has less importance than the full state portrait that is in the center of Schönbrunn Palace and which has referenced information on its status WP:REFB. See also articles like Louis XIV, George III, George IV, etc. which show full state portraits. Gryffindor (talk) 10:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- Gryffendor, the Meytens panting is the stable WP:EDITCONSENSUS supported pic that has been there for years. Since August you have been attempting to replace it with the new pic via, to date, 10 reverts. Each of your reverts has been reverted by 5 different editors restoring the Meytens painting -you’re not following WP:BRD and are edit-warring. Per WP:ONUS you need consensus to change it to the image you want - but you don’t have it. Please stop edit warring and respond to the points made. DeCausa (talk) 10:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
"Mary II of Hungary" listed at Redirects for discussion
File:Information.svg The redirect Mary II of Hungary has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Template:Slink until a consensus is reached. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
No reference of "agnatic"?
@Yourlocallordandsavior, despite maria theresa being the last habsburg monarch under an agnatic line, then why this page lacks any mention of "agnatic"? 182.253.54.95 (talk) 06:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)