Talk:Mansfield College, Oxford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 28 July 2024 by TSventon in topic Coat of arms and motto
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThisTemplate:Archives

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mansfield College, Oxford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Access

Regarding the point made in this edit, I think it may be slightly overstated. It simply is not true that all other Oxbridge colleges require access through the porter's lodge; indeed, at Cambridge, all of the colleges that lie on The Backs, for example, have at least one formal access point by design that is not the porter's lodge. Similarly, my own college of Peterhouse has two other access points, again by design. - Sitush (talk) 04:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

To clarify, I think it may not even be true that most require access through the lodge. Certainly, in the case of Cambridge. Perhaps the problem lies more in the edit summary than the text but my own somewhat hazy memories of Oxford suggest that the Cambridge experience applies to a significant number of Oxford colleges also. - Sitush (talk) 04:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I believe there may be a conflict between the official rules (especially at night, but also for non-members) and the facts in practice. Certainly as an undergrad I knew how to get into almost any college. However, they tightened things up at The House, for example, after they started charging tourists for admission. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps they have tightened things up but that has nothing to do with design (I was back at Cambridge for a few days in August and had to face-off a very annoyed person with someone from the States who didn't like the fact that I and my partner could avoid paying the entry fee at King's due to me being a member of the university! I had visions of Trump tweeting about it, especially when the porter told them where to go - which was, in short, the airport. Never get on the wrong side of a porter!) - Sitush (talk) 18:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Admission of women

I scoured the internet for a usable reference for that 1979 date (which fits my recollections), but didn't find one. I remember there was an article in The Times, so probably this is an archives access problem. Hence I left the oral history reference in place; I hope someone with access to either paper or paywalled online archives can get us a reliable source. Our article on the university cites this archived university page, which is still online substantially unchanged and doesn't give the 1979 date in either version. There are a couple of scholarly articles mentioning it; I should add one there, but I didn't find one that was more explicit than that "almost all" colleges changed to co-education that year, and Mansfield was still a hall at that time so is particularly unlikely to have been listed. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:55, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have checked The Times online archive and also the Guardian but cannot spot anything. I am surprised but perhaps it is a problem with the searching algorithm because I then tried to search for my own name and that, too, did not appear even though I could find it when I went to the relevant pages on the relevant dates. - Sitush (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

George and Elizabeth Mansfield

Job adverts by the college have this pair as the founders, but it's unclear whether they founded Spring Hill College or Mansfield College, or purchased the land for the new college or solely acted as benefactors. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 10:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The book I added as a source—I think I can see it all, but can you?—says on p. 3, at the start of its history, "Spring Hill College, Birmingham, was founded by the late George Storer Mansfield and his sisters, Mrs. Sarah Glover and Miss Elizabeth Mansfield." I was unable to find a statement that that was why it was renamed to "Mansfield" when it moved, but I may just have missed that. Yngvadottir (talk) 13:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Thanks. The plot thickens. According to "The Modern Pulpit Viewed in Its Relation to the State of Society" by Robert Vaughan, George accumulated a lot of property (he may have lived in Derby, may have been a currier and may have held property in Quorndon, Rothley and Mountsorrel, Leicestershire). He bequeathed all his property to his sisters in his will. The sisters were "more concerned to see their brother a man of piety, than to become possessed of his wealth". They set to praying, as their brother had a "practical disregard of religion" and, lo and behold, he did develop "a habit of enlightened and fervent devotedness to the service of God". He then "appropriated" the whole of his estate "and some other properties" to establish the Independent College at Spring Hill. Vaughan was writing in 1842, by which time Mansfield had died. However, there appears to be another side to the story (halfway down this page!, where the college appears to be the brainchild of Rev. Timothy East, later accused of embezzling by the sisters. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • The version in the 1890 book resembles that in the forum post as far as East's role in suggesting endowing a college, and presents moving out of the house earlier than required as being the sisters' idea (also p. 3). The next mention of East that Google indexes is p. 16, where he is said to have resigned as college treasurer and chair of the Committee of Management after "a very few years" because of "severe indisposition" which had made him unable to perform his duties. The writer says "his connection with the college ceased" after that. So if the laundry was dirty it's been left out of sight. The short time is listed as 1838–1843, but his successor served 20 years. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:59, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Not been able to access the 1890 online (though there's a copy about a mile away from me). East is in the National Portrait Gallery here. Lived to 1871, died age 88, so that "severe indisposition" didn't prevent him living another 28 years! Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 21:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Coat of arms and motto

It seems that the new motto from Seneca is now displayed on the coat of arms instead of the old one from Hebrews 1. Kaihsu (talk) 08:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Apparently it is a new brand identity. TSventon (talk) 16:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
What about the grant of arms? Kaihsu (talk) 20:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I expect the college communications team would clarify if asked. They may well have just changed the wording in their logo without involving the College of Arms. TSventon (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply