Talk:Magic Kingdom

File:Partners and Cinderella.jpg Nominated for Deletion

File:Image-x-generic.svg

An image used in this article, File:Partners and Cinderella.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Partners and Cinderella.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Cinderella Castle

I've marked the Cinderella Castle being a replica in the article as citation needed, as it's not true, but I'm not sure the correct way to go about removing it, as in if there's some delay I'm supposed to leave it. Anyone able to help me with that? ~Jason (talk) 06:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Semi-protection

I wanted to nominate this page for pp-semi-protected classification due to the volume of recent vandalism. Anyone else in favor? Remember: "Semi-protection prevents a page from being edited by anonymous and newly registered users." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihafez (talk • contribs) 02:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm in favor, the article gets vandalized probably once a week and it's almost always bogus accounts. ms784 (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Former Lands

I deleted and removed this section, as it was not cited, had false information, and was riddled with spelling and grammar mistakes. I don't have time to clean it up right now, so unless someone else fixes it, it should stay as is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.95.48.112 (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

1990s roller coaster renovation?

I've been expanding the article on Dynamic Structures and I was looking at how the firm entered into the amusement industry. According to their website, they were contacted by a "major North American theme park" to resolve problems with metal fatigue on a roller coaster. Trying to find out which ride and park it was, I came across this interview which says it was a ride at a Disney park in Florida. The only two roller coasters at Walt Disney World in the 1990s were Space Mountain and Big Thunder Mountain. So to anyone familiar with these rides, which of these rides received maintenance that would qualify as a "redesigned structure" in the 1990s? I've seen Space Mountain had a refurb in 1999, but I think that might be too late, considering Test Track and some of Dynamic Structures' other projects had already opened. Themeparkgc  Talk  05:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Media Research and Analysis

— Assignment last updated by Hazanv2 (talk) 00:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)