Talk:Lyme disease

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 May 2025 by ScienceFlyer in topic Transmission time
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Template:ArticleHistory Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Reliable sources for medical articles User:MiszaBot/config

  1. REDIRECT Template:Canvass warning

Template:Redirect category shell Script error: No such module "Message box".Template:Category handlerTemplate:Category handler Template:Notaforum Template:Top 25 Report

Chronic Lyme fudge

Asto77 Why are you adding links to the "Johns Hopkins Medicine Lyme Disease Research Center"? This is not a MEDRS and contains some dubious/quackery adjacent content. There are vast numbers of suitable MEDRS sources on lyme disease so no need for dubious sources. To be clear Chronic lyme disease is pseudo-medicine and Wikipedia needs to be ultra-careful about not blending it with legitimate lyme medicine (in the way, of course, that proponents strive for with their confusions of terms). Bon courage (talk) 14:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've tagged one of the edits with the Template:Tl template for what it's worth. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
apologies will remove. i thought John Hopkins regarded as acceptable source. thanks Asto77 (talk) 14:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Spelling variety on article

Which spelling variety (i.e. American English, British English, etc.) should we consider using for this article as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Spelling? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:09, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be US "English" (discolored e.g.). Bon courage (talk) 14:18, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I've tagged the article with the American English template where appropriate. Also, should we keep the dmy format or switch to the mdy format? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Possibly not long until a separate article for Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) is appropriate

see e.g. Long Covid. Asto77 (talk) 14:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Currently redirects to[1]. If that sections gets big, then a WP:SPLIT could be on the table. But it's quite short at the moment. Bon courage (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Transmission time

@Asto77 I'm confused as to why you reverted my edit to remove a redundant section. The article already says: Template:Tq

I support re-including the substance of this well-sourced statement that was in the article prior to today's edits: Template:Tq2 There is no reliable evidence or citation in support of the statement in the present revision: Template:Tq2 Therefore, it should be removed immediately. If you're looking for a reliable source on attachment time, I'd suggest this CDC review. ScienceFlyer (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi I'm out of capacity so I'll revet Asto77 (talk) 20:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Your extensive work on this article is greatly appreciated! ScienceFlyer (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply