Talk:Loss of supply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 December 2017 by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Rewroted section on Australia. The Senate didn't actually vote against supply, they refused to vote on the subject.

Thanks for clarifying that. JTD 02:48 Jan 4, 2003 (UTC)


Supply has a capital letter because it is a formal constitutional term in a definition. Supply with a small 's' means something different. A 'Motion of Confidence', for example, would also have capitals, as a formal term. JTD 22:52 Jan 4, 2003 (UTC)


  • "In the wake of World War II, in Japan" I wrote but I am not sure about the details. Sorry for confusing. Taku 01:18 Jan 5, 2003 (UTC)
No problem, Tak. I look forward to reading the full info when you have it. JTD 02:02 Jan 5, 2003 (UTC)

Is this vandalism or just poorly worded?

I just removed the following from the article:

Obviously the Senate didn't actually block supply, so if its not vandalism what's it trying to say? Colonial Overlord (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Template:Reflist-talk

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Loss of supply. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".