Talk:List of ZX Spectrum clones
- REDIRECT Template:Old XfD multi
Template:WikiProject banner shell
ZX Spectrum SE
As one of the people involved in the creation of the ZX Spectrum SE, I suggest the following edit (there were never any serious plans to put it into production):
The ZX Spectrum SE was a proposal for an enhanced Spectrum machine, based on the Timex TC 2048 and the ZX Spectrum 128, with Timex graphic modes, and 280K RAM[1]. A prototype was created by Jarek Adamski and Andrew Owen in 2000[1], and this configuration is supported by different emulators[2][3][4]. The specification, including ULAplus, formed the basis for the main FPGA core in the ZX-Uno.
The project evolved into the Chloe 280SE[5] which uses the FPGA core from the ZX-Uno but with an open source firmware[6] that is not directly compatible with the Spectrum.
Peters Plus, Ltd.
Someone has nominated-for-deletion the article on the builder of one of the most advanced Spectrum clones, Peters Plus, Ltd. I suggest we either enhance that article, or merge the info into here. Liam Proven (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
SAM Coupé
I took the SAM Coupé out - it isn't a Spectrum clone, it was simply made partially Spectrum compatible in an effort to show it as a natural upgrade (one, incidentally, that failed) Jamyskis 13:35, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree with this. The machine is a specific 3rd party descendant of the Spectrum +and nothing else *but* the Spectrum_. Its programming language is a superset of Spectrum BASIC, or more specifically Beta BASIC. Its graphics modes are derivatives of the TS 2068's modes. Its DOS is compatible with one of the Spectrum's many DOSes. Yes it's enhanced but so are many of the machines in this list. Liam Proven (talk) 12:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with Lproven, the SAM Coupé was clearly a ZX Spectrum clone and should be listed. Another potential addition to this list is the Memotech MTX 512 with its Speculator plugin. Kjetilho (talk)
Cleanup needed
This article was proposed for deletion on 2006-12-21 with the concerns that "Wikipedia is not a repository of links, Wikipedia is not a directory and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information". While I fully agree with those concerns (this isn't a good article at the moment), I feel that cleanup would be a better way of proceeding here: a simple and fairly informative article could be made by stripping the list down to just those machines for which articles exists, and adding a one or two sentence description of each. However... I don't have time to do this at the moment, and will be away from my Internet connection for the next week or so, so if anybody else wants to have a go at this article, please do so. If not, I'll try something in the New Year. Cheers --Pak21 22:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Relocated text from merged articles talk pages
This article incorporates text from [1]. The author of this text has agreed to license it under the GFDL. To confirm this agreement, please contact either Script error: No such module "user". or Script error: No such module "user"., citing Message-Id: <46F04706.6030102@interface1.net>. — madman bum and angel 21:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
This article incorporates text from [2]. The author of this text has agreed to license it under the GFDL. To confirm this agreement, please contact either Script error: No such module "user". or Script error: No such module "user"., citing Message-Id: <46F04706.6030102@interface1.net>. — madman bum and angel 21:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Merged with individual articles, cleanup still required
I've merged in the contents of most of the previously linked articles and converted those articles to redirects to here. Some remain as separate articles where there is sufficient contents to justify the separate article.
Many of the merged in sections still require work on their wording to clean up some opinions and speculation. Improving the consistency of the information given about each example would also improve things. --BrucePodger (talk) 14:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Extra info about Delta
I used to have a Delta-C. Of interest was that its CPU was running at a slightly higher frequency than the original ZX -- the music pitch and game speed were both slightly higher than on a ZX. This is probably not all that interesting, though
Reads like a review.
Looking at the Romanian unoffical clone, it reads like a review, one of the examples is "The keyboard looks nice" which is an opinionated and unencyclopedic statement. I would like to request an edit to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russianarmy13 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of ZX Spectrum clones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061118050257/http://www.felix.ro/cd-ice.en/index.html to http://www.felix.ro/cd-ice.en/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080417063922/http://scorpion.ru/history.php to http://scorpion.ru/history.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Needs references and some text for each machine
The list needs references for machines that don't have their own article, otherwise we can't even verify if they exist! A reference per machine really crucial, and not that hard to add. I'll do what I can, but the article is long, so some help would be good. 4throck (talk) 14:07, 25 July 2022 (UTC)