Talk:Life on Mars
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Life on Mars Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Message box".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Annual readership
Study Suggests That An Aggressive Alien Species Wiped Out An Ancient Martian Civilization Through Massive Nukes
A study by John E Brandenburg suggests that a paleolithic equivalent martian civilization was wiped out by 2 massive nuclear weapons. I would urge you to please read and discuss before you delete my topic, thank you!
Not peer reviewed but free: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340952315_EVIDENCE_OF_A_MASSIVE_THERMONUCLEAR_EXPLOSIONS_ON_MARS_IN_THE_PAST_The_Cydonian_Hypothesis_and_Fermi's_Paradox
Peer reviewed but paywalled: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2016-5529
Thank you for reading! :D
These studies could contribute to the Fermi Paradox Article as well! Chantern15 (talk) 04:35, 21 August 2021 (UTC) Chantern15
- Template:Yo I don't think anyone will delete your post here on the talk page (no one has yet, over year later and counting), but as for adding this to the article, right now it likely falls under WP:FRINGEScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. Since you've only provided the two sources, one that has not been reviewed and one that has but is paywalled, it's hard to say if they would be sufficient enough to support adding mention of this to the article (though it's probably unlikely). You would in all likelihood need more sources, and solid ones at that. (imho) - wolf 16:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- That's not paywalled nor peer reviewed - it's a conference abstract, with no attached paper, it seems. In any case, it is wildly WP:FRINGE speculation and there is no reason to include such stuff here. It might go on a page about contemporary fringe claims of intelligent life on Mars. cyclopiaspeak! 13:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)