Talk:Liar paradox

1. REDIRECT Template:Archives

Literature

Template:Pin messageUser:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil Please feel free to add entries and comments (discussions elsewhere on this talkpage, please) to this list.

Review:

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Liar paradox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110816043742/http://files.davidsanson.com/research/ArabicLiar.pdf to http://files.davidsanson.com/research/ArabicLiar.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Why "Non-cognitivist"?

Irvine's proposed solution to the paradox is listed as a "non-cognitivist" solution. It's not clear why, though. I presume it is in reference to the cognitivist theory of ethics, but I'm not sure such a reference is appropriate. Maybe "non-truth-conditional" would be more appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrilway (talk • contribs) 15:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Sourceless Arthur Prior

In the section on Arthur Prior, there are no sources? I've taken a look round the internet but every mention of him seems to just link back to this article, and I can't find anything about him and the liar paradox outside of it. Also no sources for Charles Sanders Pierce and John Buridan, which seem equally recursive in my brief search on them. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 11:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

the closest thing I've been able to find is this extract by Roy A. Sorensen in the Oxford Handbook of Truth

"The medieval logician Jean Buridan’s solution was to challenge this synonymy. His differentiator is the narcissistic principle that every statement implies its own truth- a principle that continues to attract adherents such as Eugene Mills (1998)."

then later

"According to Buridan, proposition P implicitly ascribes truth to itself" 192.76.8.81 (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Template:Hmbox Added a source for Prior. Happy editing, Paradoctor (talk) 09:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Liar paradox and Epimenides paradox

If separate articles "Liar paradox" and "Epimenides paradox" are neeced they should have pointers to each other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:14BB:159:FD1:1C7C:5535:AF23:D550 (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

They have. 🤷 Paradoctor (talk) 12:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)