Talk:Leopold II of Belgium
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leopold II of Belgium Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
- Redirect Template:Dated maintenance category
Template:Rcat shell Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Annual readership Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Old moves". User:MiszaBot/config
His own efforts
Editors have been removing from the lead the statement that the Free State came about through Leopold's own actions. This historical fact is described and referenced in the article, and is important in establishing Leopold's own responsibility for what happened there. Why are people removing it from the lead?
Change of flow to be consistent with the French language article
I would propose to reformat part of the second paragraph with the information referencing his being a “builder king” to be moved to the end after the paragraphs on the Congo free state similar to the French language version
https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9opold_II_(roi_des_Belges) 94.109.188.163 (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds plausible to me, feel free to do it. Gawaon (talk) 09:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Lead
The Lead isabout the overly long and has far too much about the Congo. The Lead should be a "Short description is a concise explanation of the scope of the page."
I would suggest we remove the last three paragraphs andheck that all the info therein is included in the appropriate section.
The third paragraph could stand as is but might benefit from a rewrite.
Any thoughts? Lukewarmbeer (talk) 12:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree the lead is currently somewhat longer than it should be. I think the last paragraph could be removed altogether. The two paragraphs before it could be shortened and combined into one, but they are too relevant to be completely removed. MOS:LEADLENGTH suggests that leads should have at most 400 words – it shouldn't be too hard to get there with a little trimming and copyediting. Gawaon (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Shall we wait a little on any other thoughts and then probably give it a prune,
- I appreciate the value of the content but the detail is (or should be) covered in the relevant section. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 16:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have no objection to pruning. But the lead needs to get across the following points: (1) He went after the Congo privately because Belgium was disinclined to join the rush to colonialism; (2) He won approval from the Berlin Conference only after misrepresenting his intentions; (3) His administration of the Congo Free State was a humanitarian disaster; (4) He became known as the Builder King for construction projects in Belgium funded largely by spoils he extorted from the Congo; (5) Belgium was so embarrassed by the Congo fiasco that it forced him to yield control of the Congo to the Belgian government; (6) He died without direct dynastic heirs, so subsequent Belgian monarchs descended from his brother Philippe.
- To completely summarize the article, we would have to add that his posthumous reputation is being revised downward through the efforts of modern historians to crack the wall of silence that has protected him for so long.
- -- Elphion (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- All good but that is a lot of detail. Too much for the Lead - which should summarise the article. We can make sure all of that detail is properly represented in the article itself.
- How about something along the lines of:
- Leopold II[a] (9 April 1835 – 17 December 1909) was the second King of the Belgians from 1865 to 1909, and the founder and sole owner of the Congo Free State from 1885 to 1908.
- Born in Brussels as the second but eldest-surviving son of King Leopold I and Queen Louise, Leopold succeeded his father to the Belgian throne in 1865 and reigned for 44 years until his death, the longest reign of a Belgian monarch to date. He died without surviving legitimate sons; the current King of the Belgians, Philippe, descends from his nephew and successor, Albert I.
- Leopold was the founder and sole owner of the Congo Free State from 1885-1908, a private colonial project, which he never visited, undertaken on his own behalf as a personal union with Belgium. His rule of the Congo Free State was characterised by ruthless exploitation of the territory for his personal gain by means of forced labour, torture, murder kidnapping and other measures that led to one of the first uses of the term "crimes against humanity"
- He is popularly referred to as the Builder King (Dutch: Koning-Bouwheer, French: Roi-Bâtisseur) in Belgium in reference to the great number of buildings, urban projects and public works he commissioned. These works were facilitated by the fortune he amassed from the ruthless exploitation of indigenous men, women and children using the mercenary Force Publique. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 19:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- That's just 229 words – too short I'd say. MOS:LEADLENGTH suggests 250–400 words as a good length. Longer articles, like this one, will generally tend to have longer leads too. So I suggest we try trimming this down to 400 words or a bit below, but there is really no need to get much below. Gawaon (talk) 09:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have trimmed the lead to around 380 words. I think it should be fine now. Gawaon (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Much better! Lukewarmbeer (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- -- Elphion (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Can this be right?
The article says, estimates for the Congolese population decline during Leopold's rule range from 1 million to 15 million. That doesn't make sense, but I don't know the correct figures. Yugan Talovich (talk) 13:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- But that's essentially what the sources say...it ranges from 1 million in the flemish source, to 10-15 million in the Independent to 15 million in the Guardian (the source they use seems not to be that credible though, if you listen to other historians). Lectonar (talk) 13:59, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Atrocities in the Congo Free State states: "Estimates of up to 13 million have been suggested, though some of the highest estimates were later retracted. A demographic study from 2020 concludes that a population decline outside the range of one to five million is improbable." It might be worthwhile updating this article based on that better consolidated information (and its sources). Gawaon (talk) 19:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)