Talk:Lemur
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lemur Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:ArticleHistory Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Copied Template:Broken anchors
Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2018
Script error: No such module "protected edit request". The Pleistocene was not in the Paleogene as you can see in the box on top of article please fix the shadow because it shows Paleogene or fix the title from Pleistocene to Paleogene 71.254.13.155 (talk) 10:37, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: Please explain what you mean when you say "fix the shadow because it shows Paleogene". I understand that the article should say Pleistocene and not Paleogene but it doesn't say Paleogene once except "To further complicate the issue, several Paleogene fossil primates from outside Madagascar, such as Bugtilemur, have been classified as lemurs" which seems appropriate. Waddie96 (talk) 16:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Etymology section
What is the rationale for having etymology and rationale for name as two separate sections? Would it be better to combine the two sections into one titled "Etymology"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AngstyHippo (talk • contribs) 14:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Phylogeny update?
I've begun a discussion at Talk:Taxonomy_of_lemurs#Horvath_v_Orlando_v_newer? UtherSRG (talk) 13:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Lead concerns
@Hemiauchenia, I noticed that with the edits you've made to the lead, the last paragraph is now quite long, and includes some information redundant to the rest of the lead (e.g. describing Archaeoindris twice). Would you be able to go through the lead to ensure it conforms to MOS:LEAD at an FA level? Sdkb talk 01:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)