Talk:Led Zeppelin IV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 May 2024 by 213.122.219.12 in topic Cover
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Archive basics

Led Zeppelin's signature song.

The article states that the album contains a number of songs "...and the band's signature song, "Stairway to Heaven"." There is no reference for the claim that Stairway to Heaven is their signature song. There is no basis for the statement so I will remove it in several days if a reference isn't added. FillsHerTease (talk) 12:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fair point.--SabreBD (talk) 15:58, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
I searched Google books for the two terms "signature song" and "Led Zeppelin", without specifying which song. Here are the results:
So it looks like most people say Stairway but there are two other contenders. Binksternet (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
It is a bit hard to know how to phrase that. "One of the band's signature songs" perhaps? It doesn't sound very decisive.--SabreBD (talk) 17:33, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Hmmm ... probably if you asked the person in the street they would say 'Stairway To Heaven'? The only reason I flagged it was that as a fan I thought 'Whole Lotta Love' might be up there too. Then there are songs like 'Dazed And Confused which was played at pretty much every show they ever did throughout their entire career. In fact that song may have actually been played at every single concert. Anyway ... I know that what the person in the street and I think are irrelevant - I'm just saying that perhaps, given that there are a number of references, none of the references don't mention it ('Rock and Roll' is mentioned as A signature, not THE signature), most people would say 'Stairway To Heaven', and your point about "one of..." sounding indecisive is correct, perhaps we should just add the references you have found and leave it at that? P.S. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! ;-) FillsHerTease (talk) 09:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Comment & Support - I to would Like 'Dazed and Confused' to be included as one their signature songs, because I'm also quite certain they played that at every single concert they ever played, as it was one of the first tracks they composed as a band. Nuro msg me 00:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Could say "one of the band's best-known songs" or "perhaps the band's best-known song"? 86.185.70.240 (talk) 11:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

US sales ranking

Template:Ping, I am confused about this edit. As far as I can see, the linked article, List of best-selling albums in the United States, quite clearly shows this album ranked second, not fourth. I don't see how I can be misunderstanding it. Do you see something that I don't? 86.185.70.240 (talk) 20:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Template:Ping I see the confusion. I thought you were talking about the cited reference [1], which lists it fourth. It is indeed listed second on the List of best-selling albums in the United States, but this is due to a difference in ranking methodology. That list ranks albums by their "shipments" whereas this article uses the RIAA certification, which is what is cited as the reference for that sentence. I don't think it's contradictory to say it's the fourth best-selling album because that's what the citation says, and other articles on best-selling albums also use the same RIAA ranking. I feel like the contradiction is more in the List of best-selling albums in the United States article because it uses two different ranking methodologies without specifying which one is more accurate.
Template:Ping BTW I left a message on your talk page when reverting your edit but you may not have gotten it since it was a different IP.
Template:Ping OK, thanks. 86.185.70.240 (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Battle of Evermore, inclusion as "one of the band's best-known songs" ?

I'm not sure about charting but, I would tend to believe that it qualifies for the list. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note that the list is quite long already, do we need to list the entire track list ? Mlpearc (open channel) 18:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Every song except "Four Sticks" is quite well-known, but I agree that it's a little excessive to have six or seven of eight songs mentioned. --BenStein69 (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
If there is a song in the list that didn't chart as well as Evermore but is more popular ? If so they can be swapped. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:53, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
What list? Piriczki (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Original photographer

Does anybody know the *original* source of the photos used with the album?

"Unseen photos of East End London in glorious colour" (by the late David Granick) from the BBC [2] looks about right, the original album has a credit for the internal illustration but not for the photos. MarkMLl (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Led Zeppelin IV/GA1

Ian Stewart

As much as I love Ian Stewart he did NOT appear on piano for the song Rock And Roll. He didn't. I have the original album and the only person who is credited to have been a guest on Led Zeppelin IV was Sandy Denny. Allmusic.com does not have him listed on there either. Please stop adding him! He appeared on Physical Graffiti but not IV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.136.108.234 (talk) 01:36, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

He is not credited, but Dave Lewis, a Led Zeppelin expert who has been endorsed by the band, confirms his appearance. The jam from the same recording session, "Boogie With Stu" (named after him) appears on Physical Graffiti. Because the Rolling Stones were signed to a different label than Led Zeppelin, it may not have been possible to credit him for legal reasons. As you can see from a brief summary at WP:WikiProject Led Zeppelin, Lewis is one of the very few authors on this subject who the band themselves consider a reliable source, and in my opinion it's the best you can get. Some background reading : [3], [4], [5] Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:07, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Genres, yet again

It seems every now and again, an argument flares up over what the "genre" field in the infobox should be, and it looks like it's this article's turn this week. I have reverted back to the version that passed the GA review as a starting point. If anyone feels hard done by, say so. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

What an arbitrary point of revision to revert back to; will doing this magically deter something like this from happening again? Why not just revert and report the anonymous, genre-warring IP vandal, whose edits and argument carry no weight here? As opposed to pretending like the several sources cited in the article, mentioning metal, don't exist. Dan56 (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
All I see is an editor who disagrees with you. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:01, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry you feel that way. Dan56 (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Heavy metal

"Heavy metal" is unfit for purpose as a genre describing this album. Within the article indeed, sourced content states that this album is one pertaining to the genre in question, and indeed there are copious inferences as to its influence on the metal genre. However, this genre is unsuitable for inclusion in the infobox; if an article were to include any genre in its infobox, be it "heavy metal" or otherwise, one would expect a corpus of songs of this type on the album. To the contrary, all of the songs within have articles with info-boxes and of these none describe the relevant song as "heavy metal".

I thus propose the removal of this genre, as it is inapposite in describing this album's songs. I am willing to discuss this point at length, and will not make any changes without prior approval. JoeyofScotia (talk) 19:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Headley Grange

The picture in the article identified as Headley Grange is NOT Headley Grange. 50.34.131.75 (talk) 00:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC) Jon AllenReply

Hard Rock Cafe guitar authenticity questioned

Hi, would anyone here be able to confirm or deny this claim, that stop bars were further from the bridges on Page's guitar, and thus this is merely a similar guitar? There may not be a reliable source, but if that seems true, I'd say there's enough reasonable doubt to remove the photo from the article.

Paging Ritchie333, as based on the GAN, I believe you're the subject expert. -- Zanimum (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I added a free version of the ZoSo symbol

Hello, I found and uploaded to the Commons a free version of the Saturn sigil used by Page for his symbol. See File:Zoso from p 31 of Le triple vocabulaire infernal from 1847.jpg. It is a sigil for the planet Saturn[1] from p. 31 of Le Triple vocabulaire infernal, manuel du démonomane, ou Les ruses de l'Enfer dévoilées, published in Paris, France, Printed by Typ. de Blocquel-Castiaux, in 1847[2]; from a public domain book at Internet Archive, see: https://archive.org/details/BIUSante_73618/page/n35/mode/2up and https://ia903105.us.archive.org/BookReader/BookReaderImages.php?zip=/19/items/BIUSante_73618/BIUSante_73618_jp2.zip&file=BIUSante_73618_jp2/BIUSante_73618_0036.jp2&id=BIUSante_73618&scale=2&rotate=0; a similar symbol was used by Jimmy Page as his personal symbol/logo for the untitled Led Zeppelin album commonly called Led Zeppelin IV.

Template:Reflist-talk

See also:

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

I have put this free-use, public domain image into the article. If you think it should be put somewhere else, that's acceptable. TuckerResearch (talk) 17:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've used Inkscape to make a vectorized version of the symbol based on this illustration. I'm unfamiliar with the procedures of editing pages, so it may be some time before I can post it. 128.92.153.146 (talk) 13:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cover

"The typeface for the lyrics to "Stairway to Heaven", printed on the inside sleeve of the album, was Page's contribution. He found it in an old Arts and Crafts magazine called The Studio which dated from the late 19th century. He thought the "lettering was interesting and arranged for someone to create a whole alphabet."

This may be of interest for further information if you feel it is pertinent: Led Zeppelin IV: Jimmy Page versus Little Bo-Peep (John Coulthart, 2 May 2022) Dorian Grumbler Chatterbox No XVI 121 The Merchant They are all obviously out of copyright by now. 213.122.219.12 (talk) 02:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".