Talk:Lead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 28 April 2025 by 98.19.179.27 in topic Resources?
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Template:ArticleHistory Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Message box".Template:Academic peer reviewed Template:Spoken Wikipedia request Template:Section size User:MiszaBot/config Template:Archives

A guide on how to add a reference to this article and fall in line with the general referencing style
  1. Write a reference as you usually would in a template that is most appropriate for your reference: Template:Tl, Template:Tl, Template:Tl, Template:Tl, or any other template of this series, preceded by an asterisk for the bullet list. Please use |first1=, |last1=, |first2=, |last2=, etc.; also, please add |displayauthors=3 if there are more than three authors (alternatively, add only three authors and then add |displayauthors=etal). Finish your reference template by |ref=harv. Please use initials instead of complete first names, the shorter range notation for page numbers except when the two number differ only in the last digit (1234–5678; 1234−567; 123–45; however, 123–24), and the mdy date format ("January 1, 1970"). Add author links if possible (via |authorlink=).
  2. Do not add it not in the text, enclosed by <ref></ref> tags; add to the Bibliography section following the alphabetical order of references. Alphabetical order is set by the first word in the displayed reference text; this will be either the last name of the first author (or the author organization if the author is an organization) or, if no author is present, the title of the referenced work.
  3. Add a Template:Tl template to the piece of text you want to reference. All parameters are unnamed, except for the |page= parameter (or |pages=, or |p=, or |pp=). Add them in the following order: last names of the first four (or less, if less are provided) authors; year of publication; |page= or analogous parameter.

The following reference should look like this:

  • * {{cite book |last=Emsley |first=J. |authorlink=John Emsley |title=Nature's Building Blocks: An A-Z Guide to the Elements |year=2011 |publisher=Oxford University |isbn=978-0-19-850341-5 |ref=harv}} in the Bibliography section; and
  • {{sfn|Emsley|2011|p=280}} in the text near the claim.

(please do not archive this message; it is a general instruction and is meant to remain untagged)

The page is vandalized

Why is it vandalized? I’m gonna revert it 70.44.83.80 (talk) 17:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

You missed a bit, but I got that for you. Thanks for your help! 81.187.192.168 (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Classical Era Lead Production

The section Classical Era begins with the statement "Because silver" is if the connection between lead production was obvious, which it isn't. I therefore investigated the reference 130 provided, which conflicts with a statement later in the section. In the reference it states that despite the existence of silver with lead, they believe that leads main connection with silver is using lead in the silver extraction process, which they did regardless of the silver ore. That conflicts with the statement that most lead was extracted just because they were looking for silver.

  I don't know anything about this, so can somebody please have a look at it ?

IceDragon64 (talk) 23:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm not seeing a contradiction. "Lead came into use as an exchange medium" is in the sentence that uses reference 130, which describes the extraction of silver from Galena using the properties of lead. Also, the connection between lead and silver is described under the previous heading at reference 124. Reconrabbit 13:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Resources?

In the occurrence section, it says "World lead resources exceed two billion tons". Resources?? I have no idea what that means, if anything. Last I heard, mineral quantities were most commonly talked about as "reserves" - at least in a mining and usage context. Upon encountering this statement, I checked the reference. The citation contains NO MENTION of either reserves or 'resources'. I was able to find a USGS page, here: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-lead.pdf that was likely the intended citation. Since the wiki citation is cited at least 3 other times, I wasn't inclined to wade thru which should and shouldn't be linked to the old vs my new cite. Maybe someone can fix this?98.19.179.27 (talk) 06:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply