Talk:Latent homosexuality
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Untitled
This may mean a hidden inclination or potential for interest in homosexual relationships, which is either suppressed or not recognised, and which has not yet been explored "for real" or may never be explored in fact.
In other words something that can be postulated arbitrarily, as convinient for arguments that can't be disproven because it is "latent".
- Talk pages don't exist for this kind of debate. TaintedMustard 17:54, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
- But this article fails to explain what "latent" actually means. --74.101.43.43 (talk) 14:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Image caption
The image at the top of the article showed an individual who is identified on the image page. The caption suggested that he might be a latent homosexual. I'm pretty sure that that is against WP:BLP#Images, so I'm removing it. Scolaire (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
How about replacing it with a picture of that "god hates fags" guy? He is the obvious poster child. 75.191.151.75 (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Latent homosexuality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828010959/http://web.morons.org/menagerie/books/homogen6.jsp to http://web.morons.org/menagerie/books/homogen6.jsp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
On Links to Homophobia
I edited the part that was suggesting that the cited study "indicated" that homophobes were repressed homosexuals, since this is not what the study indicates, something that was also explained later on the paragraph.
Moreover, I'd like to change the current cited study to this one that is more recent and done better, but I lack the linguistical skills (I'm not a native english speaker). Psy.hip (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)