Talk:Kajol
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kajol Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Early sources from the archives
Sections
As I said, the idea that she had only two years of what is called here "widespread success" (this should change too) is unimaginably funny. I personally think that from 1999-2001 she was still successful and a big star even if she had flops (like any actor). But anyway 1995 was a big year for her.
I suggest one of the following:
- Debut and rise to prominence (1992–1996)
- Widespread success (1997–2001)
- Comeback and intermittent work (2006–2012)
- Dilwale and return to Tamil cinema (2015–2019)
- Tanhaji and Netflix debut (2020–present)
or:
- Debut and rise to prominence (1992–1994)
- Widespread success (1995–1998)
- Comeback and intermittent work (2006–2012)
- Dilwale and return to Tamil cinema (2015–2019)
- Tanhaji and Netflix debut (2020–present)
Generally, if we change "Widespread success" to "mainstream success" or "established actress". Shahid • Talk2me 10:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- The first one. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Don't you think DDLJ is part of her widespread success and not part of her breakthrough? Shahid • Talk2me 14:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have been thinking about it; you are right. The second one is better. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Don't you think DDLJ is part of her widespread success and not part of her breakthrough? Shahid • Talk2me 14:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)