Talk:Justin Hartley

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Justin Hartley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110827115010/http://www.cwtv.com/shows/smallville/cast/justin-hartley to http://www.cwtv.com/shows/smallville/cast/justin-hartley
• Added Template:Tlx tag to http://it.eonline.com/news/watch_with_kristin/smallville_season_eight_look_whos_in/4385
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.streamys.org/nominees-winners/2009-nominees/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://cdn.emmyonline.org/day_43rd_nominations.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Justin Hartley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091213043833/http://redcanyonmovie.com/home/utah-calls-red-canyon-too-controversial to http://redcanyonmovie.com/home/utah-calls-red-canyon-too-controversial

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Personal life

The source used for a third marriage looked like classic synthesis: They've been seen out together, they've been spotted sporting rings on their ring fingers, we've been told by an unnamed source, ergo they must have got married. No actual proof of this conclusion was provided. BLP requires better sourcing for statements like this. Nthep (talk) 15:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Well, after legal threats leading to a block, we still end up with a decent result. I guess the user's "legal team" will be stoked to have missed out on their fee for this one. Thanks for evaluating the source, @Nthep. ⁓ Pelagic ( messages ) 02:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

I found this discussion after the marriage was removed from the infobox. If the information is unreliable then surely it shouldn't be in either the infobox or personal life section? CountessCobra (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Removed. Us Weekly should never be used for something like this. Even the original People article apparently does not confirm the marriage. The best that could be done with this is "It has been reported that..." but for BLP info like this, that is likely a poor way to go. Unless and until there is some follow-up reporting or social media posting confirming they are married, this needs to stay out of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:17, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

People does seem to confirm their marriage: Hartley was first linked to Pernas in June 2020, and they got married in May 2021. Also E Online: Days after E! News confirmed their marital status, Justin Harley and Sofia Pernas stepped out... and Entertainment Tonight Justin Hartley Shows His Love for 'Beautiful' Wife Sofia Pernas in Birthday Post, which references an Instagram post. Per WP:RSP, People is considered to be a reasonable source. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Template:Re Thanks for that! That recent People source was just the kind of "confirmatory" source that I think we were looking for, as the original People source from several months ago wasn't conclusive on the question. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)