Talk:Jury nullification
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jury nullification Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell
Comment
Camden 28. Go to www.camden28.org. US 1973 Antiwar trial. Defendants found not guilty by jury despite being caught in act of the distruction of draft files.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbcouming (talk • contribs) 14:10, 13 July 2007
UK Section - Colston 4/Bristol 4
- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jan/04/jury-in-colston-statue-trial-urged-to-be-on-the-right-side-of-history
- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-59892211
- https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/colston-bristol-verdict-city-history-b1988937.html
- https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/colston-4-cleared-bristol-city-6447349
- https://thebristolactivist.com/2022/01/06/not-guilty-colston-4-acquitted-by-jury-majority/
213.249.161.145 (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- See also
- - http://insulatebritain.com/2023/05/15/breaking-high-noon-at-crown-court/
- - https://juststopoil.org/2023/07/17/breaking-dozens-more-people-risk-prison-for-literally-upholding-the-law/
- - https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/activists-jailed-for-seven-weeks-for-defying-ban-on-mentioning-climate-crisis/
- - https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/climate-activists-risk-contempt-charges-over-placards-outside-court-mkxqk5rtx Chorl (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- I've added a paragraph to the UK section for this; one might want to add one for the Bristol verdict Chorl (talk) 11:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Explain what is being nullified
For a reader unfamiliar with the common law system, the term "jury nullification" may intuitively mean that either the jury or its verdict is nullified, which (as I understand it now) is not the case: the term apparently means that the jury nullifies the law for this case. It would be good if this was explained early in the intro. – gpvos (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC) – gpvos (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)