Talk:John Lackey
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Born?
someone should put something in about when he was born. i think he started game seven at eighteen years old or something freakish like that.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegas007 (talk • contribs)
I hope your not talking about game 7 of the world series ? because he wsa 21 or 22 at that time.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.74.104 (talk • contribs)
LACKEY IS A RED SOX
MLB NETWORK AND ESPN AREN'T GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU? 67.162.133.18 (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- It's not official even they say so.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 23:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Got to read the fine print. ...a source familiar with the negotiations told ESPN.com's Jayson Stark. It's pesky phrases like this, that separates confirmed from still rumor.--Cube lurker (talk) 23:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20091214&content_id=7807410&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb 67.162.133.18 (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- From the first paragraph: Now, they have reportedly added a third. Reportedly is a fancy way of saying it's unconfirmed.--Cube lurker (talk) 00:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20091214&content_id=7807410&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb 67.162.133.18 (talk) 00:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- which is another way of saying "wait 45 minutes and it'll be confirmed" remember justsomerandomguy32? you guys are being like him, which btw is bad. 67.162.133.18 (talk) 00:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- from the article: "Lackey will join Jon Lester and Josh Beckett in what would have to be considered one of the most formidable rotation trios in the Major Leagues." 67.162.133.18 (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- From the article: "Earlier on Monday, it was reported that the Red Sox were having Lackey take a physical, typically an indication that a free agent is on the verge of signing." I think we should just say he's a Red Sox. Jonathansuh (talk) 00:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- WP:CRYSTAL - wait for an official announcement; do not add speculative/potential/possible/likely roster changes to Wiki. --Madchester (talk) 01:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- From the article: "Earlier on Monday, it was reported that the Red Sox were having Lackey take a physical, typically an indication that a free agent is on the verge of signing." I think we should just say he's a Red Sox. Jonathansuh (talk) 00:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oh God here we go...... It's not speculative it has happened. 67.162.133.18 (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- If "it has happened" Sox team officials will confirm the deal has been completed. It's that simple. Ben Sheets "agreed to a 2 year contact" with the Rangers earlier this year - but he failed his physical so the contract never became officail. A few years ago, that Jason Kidd trade was "agreed upon" by the Mavsericks and Nets. However, it fell through after Devean George activated his no trade clause... and a different set of players had to be involved in another trade between both teams. Transactions fall through for dozens of reasons...hence WP:CRYSTAL's provisions against unoffical roster changes. This ties in with WP:BLP, and the need to write conservatively about a living subject. --Madchester (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oh God here we go...... It's not speculative it has happened. 67.162.133.18 (talk) 01:09, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Lackey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226051806/http://bleacherreport.com/articles/178320-john-lackey-ejected-after-two-pitches-shows-lack-of-sportsmanship to http://bleacherreport.com/articles/178320-john-lackey-ejected-after-two-pitches-shows-lack-of-sportsmanship
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)