Talk:John Ford
Template:Talkheader Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Archives User:MiszaBot/config
User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
'auteur'
LOL. THAT pompous French nonsense ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.103.107.57 (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Didn't find what I was looking for here
One tiny mention about Ford's use of shadows. Well at least it is acknowledged I guess. Problem as I see it is that the man's work is still communicating with the audience and the extensive history and Hollywood/industry info. in the article is necessary too, the reasons for the fact that this guy's work is still touching people today should be given a little more attention.TeeVeeed (talk) 21:31, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Ford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added Template:Tlx tag to http://www.history.navy.mil/bios/ford_john.htm
- Added Template:Tlx tag to http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq81-8b.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415183637/http://www.eastmanhouse.org/museum/awards.php to http://www.eastmanhouse.org/museum/awards.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Racism
| Block evasion by banned User:HarveyCarter. |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
The article should mention that most of his films are widely seen as racist. (81.159.6.100 (talk) 04:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC))
|
Missing: Ford's masterpiece
The article, although very long, tells a detailed sequence of events but sort of skips over the heavy influence that John Ford's work had on film. Nowhere is it mentioned, for instance, whether any particular work is considered a masterpiece (or perhaps a masterpiece of his Western style, etc.)
DouglasHeld (talk) 11:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Personality section
The Personality section is very long with lots of detail, but very few sources. Can someone provide them to avoid deletion of the offending material? I do not doubt its veracity, but the article still needs to conform to WP policy.Ashmoo (talk) 10:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)