Talk:Jodie Sweetin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 27 August 2022 by Geraldo Perez in topic Name changes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Top 25 Report User:MiszaBot/config

Please add movie

Jodie will be in Finding Santa in November 2017 as Jessica in Hallmark movie http://www.hallmarkchannel.com/christmas/2017-holiday-movies-preview/10 . 68.231.27.254 (talk) 05:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Yes check.svg Done Added. However, didn't state her role, as the source provided doesn't directly state "Jessica" as Sweetin's role - it is in the film's description at Hallmark Channel, but we'll need another reliable source to connect the dots to avoid WP:OR. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jodie Sweetin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2018

Script error: No such module "protected edit request". Jodie sweetin number (redacted) 2600:8805:5A01:DA70:9546:9833:8538:17D (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. qwerty6811 :-) Chat Ping me 20:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Recovered" or "recovering"

I've seen several edits in recent weeks in the Substance abuse section, like this one [1], changing it from "Sweetin is a recovered drug addict" to "Sweetin is a recovering drug addict". I'm reverting it each time, as "recovering" doesn't appear to be the right word, from what I'm reading from one of the cited references here. In the ABC News article, from 2006 ([2], found at the end of the third sentence, which ends in "bored"), it reads Template:Tq I can't say 100% that this means "recovered", but it's even less likely that it means "recovering". MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The theory goes that you're never a "recovered" addict, you're always "in recovery"... The issue here is that the source actually uses neither word, so I'm thinking to avoid issues like "recovered" vs. "recovering" we should actually reword that to avoid use of the word as the source doesn't use it. --IJBall (contribstalk) 13:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have decided to remove the sentence in dispute altogether. It could be seen as like a paragraph's topic sentence, which generally expresses an opinion, with the other sentences in the paragraph supporting that sentence with facts. I'm not sure whether sentences of this nature are encyclopedic, and at this point, I think that just removal of the sentence is sufficient for now, but if others want to chime in as to how to improve the Substance abuse section, please do. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Name changes

Name changes must be well sourced. Specifically it is not automatic on marriage, particularly for people with a notable career in their original name. Also if it does change, the source must be clear on what it was changed to, there are a lot of options. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply