Talk:Jim Crow laws
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jim Crow laws Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell User:MiszaBot/config
Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2025
Template:Edit semi-protected I request for the Native Lands Act 1865 to be added to the See also section please. 2A0A:EF40:1395:D501:EDD7:4ED2:E853:DD01 (talk) 17:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:Yes check.svg Done 22:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2025
Template:Edit semi-protected I also request for the Indian Act and Israeli apartheid to be added to the See also section, please. 2A0A:EF40:1395:D501:710C:B049:86C2:C1A (talk) 10:11, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- File:Yes check.svg Done 22:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 May 2025
Template:Edit semi-protected I request for Sharecropping to be added to the See also section, please. 2A0A:EF40:13B6:7201:405C:C476:A8A7:8FE0 (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 May 2025
Template:Edit semi-protected I request for Penal labor to be removed from the See also section and replaced with Convict leasing. 81.77.66.151 (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2025
Template:Edit semi-protected I request for the Nuremberg Laws to be added to the See also section please. 2A0A:EF40:13B6:7201:938:10F2:DB78:63FB (talk) 19:09, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- File:X mark.svg Not done: They are linked in the "international" section. Per [[MOS:NOTSEEAGAIN] things that already have links don't go in See also meamemg (talk) 19:59, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2025
Template:Edit semi-protected I request for the Indian Removal Act, Trail of Tears, Indian reservation, Internment of Japanese Americans, and the Nuremberg Laws to be added to the See also section. 2A0A:EF40:13B6:7201:D567:B996:81A7:48A4 (talk) 15:23, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- File:X mark.svg Not done: per the response to the previous edit request, and because the other articles you propose to link are not sufficiently relevant to this one. Day Creature (talk) 22:05, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Racial policy of Nazi Germany includes a substantial subsection on Jim Crow laws. I intend to add it after I augment the International subsection of this article with more critical reviews and follow-ups (personal prioritizing, not substantiating one with the other). If you dissent, please reply directly to this response. Bustamove1 (talk) 02:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 26 May 2025
Template:Edit semi-protected I request for the Nuremberg Laws to be added to the See also section, since the Nuremberg Laws were inspired by the Jim Crow laws. 2A0A:EF40:1231:A801:595F:AC68:EB71:C55 (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- File:X mark.svg Not done: As was pointed out to you the last time you requested this, there is already a link to the Nuremberg Laws in the article, so there is no need to link to them again in the See also section. Day Creature (talk) 07:26, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- If your concern is only the Nuremberg Laws, I would first provide further summative content on the 1934 drafting sessions. There are monographs that evaluate individual citations to, and entire session discussions about, Heinrich Krieger's memorandum (the basis of Race Law in the United States), during sessions spearheaded by Franz Gürtner and Bernhard Lösener. Elaboration on these secondary sources would likely further your cause. Regardless, editors and users may or may not be more amenable to "See Also" Racial policy of Nazi Germany, given eugenics and the extant subsection in that article. I'll add it once I finish this article's International subsection...or another editor or user does. This would also (likely) further your cause, as the content of a number of Wikipedia articles do not yet accurately reflect the prevailing historiography on the transmission of Jim Crow precepts into Nazi racial policy. That said, most of the articles on Eugenics in the United States already include sections or subsections on Nazi eugenics (and vice-versa), so perhaps race laws should be reconceived as a starting point. Bustamove1 (talk) 20:22, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2025
Template:Edit semi-protected I request for Pass law to be added to the See also section, please. 2A0A:EF40:13B6:7201:24DC:89B3:4CCC:4778 (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- File:Yes check.svg Done —Sirdog (talk) 22:36, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- The appropriation of the apartheid-imposed "Coloureds" as a stratified collectivity against "less [rights] than White people...but better than Black Africans" was eroded by anti-apartheid "Black People" solidarity during the 1980s. In the present day, the reclassification of "Coloureds" as "Black People" has expectedly or unexpectedly contributed to a "not Black enough" ideology stemming from the anti-apartheid movement. See, for example, Amanuel Isak Tewolde, "Self-identification in post-Apartheid South Africa: The case of Coloured people in Johannesburg, South Africa" Social Sciences & Humanities Open (Vol. 9: Spring 2024), 1-9. Bustamove1 (talk) 00:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)