Talk:Jefferson Memorial
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jefferson Memorial Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:OnThisDay User:MiszaBot/config
Ionic or Ionian
Well, which is it? I don't like the word ionic. It sounds like chemistry. But do these words mean the same thing?Longinus876 (talk) 15:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Locate and include inscription
File:Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 1.jpg to appear as POTD soon
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 1.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 15, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-02-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC) Template:POTD/2016-02-15
Cato Institute
I think the criticism section is POV, considering that it consists primarily of one oppositional voice, heavily quoted, from a partisan think tank, which is apparently trying to take back ownership of jefferson from the New Deal era, and return it to the neoconservative movement. I think there may be some disagreement about this being "objective" and unchallenged. I think that pretty much any memorial, no matter how revered, can have a criticism found of it, so i dont have a problem with a secxtion. Statue of Liberty has a brief mention of opposition to the memorial, but doesnt have a section criticizing the entire premise of the memorial. The section would be better if it contained evidence that more than one voice has criticized the monuments ties to liberalism, esp in its use of quotes. my previous comment here was removed appropriately for its tone. im better now. If i can find some comments, either positive or negative, to add here, i will.(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 17:40, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Map
The map at the head of the article should show the exact location of the Memorial.Paulhummerman (talk) 13:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- It does, it's that red dot. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)