Talk:Jack Black

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 24 April 2025 by Ser! in topic Hypocorism?
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Message box".

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Message box". Template:Copied Template:Contentious topics/talk notice Template:Category handlerScript error: No such module "Copied". User:MiszaBot/config Template:Former AFI

Semi-protected edit request

Script error: No such module "protected edit request". In the Early life section, in the second paragraph, please remove the sentence “ As a child, he appeared in a commercial for the Activision game Pitfall! in 1982.” This is already mentioned in the career section. 2600:382:1144:5F1:0:0:0:69B (talk) 03:29, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Yes check.svg Done I agree that it is better suited in the Career section. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hypocorism?

I note "Jack" has been removed a few times with editors citing MOS:HYPOCORISM or MOS:NICKNAME. Is "Jack" a common hypocorism of Jacob? Genuine question as I have never seen Jacob shortened to Jack - Jacob tends to shorten to Jake, while Jack is a nickname for John. — ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 12:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not having “Jack” there seems very Pointy. I don’t recall it being used a shortening of Jacob. As you say, Jake would be the option there. Seasider53 (talk) 13:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
I believe that referring to Mr. Black as being "professionally referred to as Jack Black" would be the best course of action. For instance, articles like Dr. Seuss and Brian Eno mention both the full names and the professional ones. Bloated and Frozen (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you both for the comments; I've added Jack back as such. If this is disputed I'll happily start an RfC because I note per the history of the page that this has been going on for quite a while... ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 07:45, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply