Talk:Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:ARBPIA User:MiszaBot/config
- REDIRECT Template:Archives
Citation in second paragraph (ECP edit request)
This could really use a citation:
The motivation behind the disengagement was described by Sharon's top aide as a means of isolating Gaza and avoiding international pressure on Israel to reach a political settlement with the Palestinians.
Here's an article that would work: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/07/israel
Per that article, I'd suggest editing the text as follows:
The motivation behind the disengagement was described by Sharon's top aide as a means of isolating Gaza and avoiding international pressure on Israel to reach a political settlement with the Palestinians, foreclosing the possibility of a Palestinian state.
Violet (talk) 22:53, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Untitled
Archive 1: April 2005 - October 2006
Warnings about the consequesnes of the Disengagement
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/319985/jewish/Gaza-
citation for first paragraph
"Gaza Strip is still considered to be occupied under international law."
There's a citation needed flag on that sentence, although it contains a link to the page on "ICJ case on Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories." An article that deals straight-forwardly with that issue is: Lisa Hajjar (14 July 2017) Is Gaza Still Occupied and Why Does It Matter?, Jadaliyya. Available at: https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/27557/Is-Gaza-Still-Occupied-and-Why-Does-It-Matter (Accessed: 7 February 2025). Others can be easily found using Google's Gemini AI tool.Marbux (talk) Marbux (talk) 20:56, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Samaria?
So if we get enough people to start calling Israel “shithole,” are you guys going to put (shithole) in parentheses next to Israel? Samaria is not another name for the West Bank. It is only referred to as that term by less than 1% of the world population. The rest call it the West Bank. This needs to be removed 38.69.58.95 (talk) 02:43, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 1 April 2025the first paragraph is too much about legal issues
Template:Edit extended-protected
Description of suggested change: more than half of the first paragraph is about legal issues, and should not be so. This article is about the disengagement, not the legal situation post-disengagement. The first paragraph should state what the disengagement was, what led to it, how it was implemented and how it affected the Palestinians in Gaza and the settlers who where forced out of it. The legal status of Gaza post-disengagement is less important for this article in my on POV and should be in the second paragraph. Template:TextDiff 85.65.238.86 (talk) 21:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
- File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Please provide proposed text. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 April 2025
Template:Edit extended-protected
72.23.138.247 (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
isreal no longer provides aid they have cut off aid. 4/8/25
update your damn article idiots
- File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
The israeli view
Israel maintains that it no longer occupies the Gaza Strip, following its full withdrawal. Since 2005 it has not exercised effective control over the territory itself, a key criterion for occupation under international law. Israel emphasizes that Gaza has been governed de facto by Hamas since 2007, which functions as the ruling authority with govroment, independent security forces and civil institutions. While Israel retains control over Gaza’s borders, airspace, and maritime zone, it asserts that these measures are driven by security concerns and do not constitute effective territorial control. Accordingly, Israel contends that it bears no legal obligations of an occupying power and considers Gaza a “hostile entity,” governed independently and responsible for its own population.
The text does not present this position at all; it only offers an explanation of why Israel is mistaken. Pacifico (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)