Talk:Islamic calendar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 29 March by JMF in topic Remove photo
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Mbox

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:Censor Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Mbox Template:On this day Template:Backwardscopy User:MiszaBot/config Template:Archives

Other calendars using the Islamic era: bold, revert, discuss

In this edit, User:Ahammed Saad asserts that the Bengali calendar is based on the lunar Hijri calendar. There are some problems with that assertion:

  1. The epoch of the Bengali calendar is not the Hijrah
  2. The Bengali calendar is solar (like the Shia solar Hijri calendar), not lunar (like the Sunni lunar Hijri calendar)
  3. The origin of the Bengali calendar is disputed. Bengali calendars#History says
    1. Template:Tq
    2. Template:Tq
    3. Template:Tq

So Ahammed Saad's assertion needs the support of an independent WP:RS 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:26, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore, the epoch of the Bengali Calendar is 693 AH (1556 CE), not the Higra. So it is no more a "calendar using the Islamic era" than is the Juche calendar of North Korea, purely on the basis that both were established after the foundation of the Hijri Calendar. Or should we say equally that the Hijri calendars use the Christian Era (Anno Domini).
One of the sources says that Alauddin Husain Shah had to resolve the fact that the Lunar Hijri calendar takes no account of the seasons of the year and thus of the ability to pay taxes. So the calendar he developed took into account both the religious and the civil obligations. So it might be argued (and an RS would have to say so) that the the Bengali calendar is partly based on the Hijri calendar. But that is a long way from saying it is based on the Hijri era, which means the time that has elapsed since the epoch.
Thus, per wp:STATUSQUO, I have removed the addition as a WP:No original research violation. The WP:ONUS is now on Mr Saad to produce a neutral reliable source that supports his interpretation. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 21:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2025

Template:Edit semi-protected Open source calendar converters

why do we need another one? What makes this one special? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Appears to be in Arabic only which doesn't make it easy for an English user to infer on which method or algorithm it is based. AstroLynx (talk) 10:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
File:X mark.svgΒ Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the Template:Tlx template. Shadow311 (talk) 18:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Remove photo

Remove photo it's inappropriate 2409:40E5:200D:EA67:D4B2:49FF:FE33:CF0C (talk) 12:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

You will have to be more specific (also see the link "Wikipedia is not censored" at the top of the talk page). AstroLynx (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
See also Talk:Muhammad/FAQ. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply