Talk:Isabelle, Countess of Paris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 21 September 2020 by Vpab15 in topic Requested move 12 September 2020
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Old AfD multi Template:WikiProject banner shell

Untitled

Ah, so much not to "recognize" in these "royalist" circles! Major impediments to restoration of monarchy are the royalists.--Wetman 07:53, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Publications

I added four titles I initially found in British Library catalogue (there are more), but Worldcat has a much longer list. PamD 09:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 September 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (non-admin closure) Vpab15 (talk) 23:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply



Princess Isabelle of Orléans-BraganzaTemplate:No redirect – This is an English translation of the "Isabelle, comtesse de Paris" name under which she published books, and it is consistent with the article on her husband Henri, Count of Paris (1908–1999). The article was recently kept at AfD. It was noted that she had obituaries in several serious newspapers (eg The Times), none of which referred to her as "Princess". The article was at the title "Isabelle, comtess de Paris" until moved in 2009 by the now-blocked User:LouisPhilippeCharles, whose username suggests a possible French Royalist POV. I wouldn't object strongly to moving to Isabelle, comtesse de Paris or Isabelle, Comtesse de Paris: either could be argued for and would be a vast improvement on the current title. PamD 07:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.