Talk:Iraq War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 June 2025 by Lova Falk in topic Should John Howard be added as a leader?
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Message box".

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Message box". Template:Annual readership Template:Section sizes User:MiszaBot/configUser:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

Human Rights Abuses

Section update: $42 million in damages were awarded in November 2024 to former prisoners at Abu Ghraib. See https://www.democracynow.org/2024/11/14/baher_azmy_caci_guantanamo_lawsuit_torture 2600:1001:B128:A069:C805:F112:660F:A404 (talk) 16:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2025

Template:Edit semi-protected I request the word "fabricated" in the first sentence in the 4th paragraph be changed to "erroneous" or something similar (false, untrue). The NYT citation should also be removed. Therefore the sentence would read "The primary justifications for the invasion centered around erroneous claims Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and that Saddam Hussein was supporting al-Qaeda"

My justifications are as follows: The citation used is an article primarily about Scott Ritter's conviction for child sex crimes so it's inappropriate for use here and it's presently the only cite in the lead. Furthermore it actually fails to support usage of the term "fabricated". The article doesn't say this. It quotes Ritter stating "The reality is that there were no WMDs in Iraq, and there was no active program. The Bush administration took a decision to go to war based on the pretense of WMDs, and it was a lie." He calls it a lie which is different to stating that it was deliberately fabricated. Most importantly, we shouldn't be using Ritter's opinion as fact here in the lead. It would be undue. Erroneous or false is a more accurate and an uncontroversial description of the WMD claims and it's a fair summary of the article. 78.146.11.249 (talk) 20:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:X mark.svg Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the Template:Tlx template. Ultraodan (talk) 12:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2025

Template:Edit semi-protected Article is too long shorten it. 45.49.246.117 (talk) 06:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Ultraodan (talk) 11:58, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Should John Howard be added as a leader?

Seems like it would make sense 68.199.243.137 (talk) 02:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

What'd he do? Remsense ‥  02:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
PM of Australia during invasion, makes sense since bush and Blair are listed. 147.9.2.202 (talk) 00:53, 16 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
More importantly, what does the article tell us he did? Cinderella157 (talk) 00:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
IMHO: no. No need to mention him. Australia contributed with troops and that has been mentioned. It does not seem that Howard did anything more than just let Australia contribute. Lova Falk (talk) 09:25, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply