Talk:Intuitionistic linear logic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 31 May 2004 by Kaustuv in topic Natural deduction formulation
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is what used to be there.

Natural deduction formulation

We shall follow Martin Löf's style of hypothetical judgments. A linear hypothetical judgment A1,A2,,AnA, abbreviated as ΔA, defines the logical fact that the goal A is obtained from the resources Ai by consuming each resource exactly once. The simplest judgment is that of linear consumption of hypothesis, which is written as an axiomatic rule: AA

(Note that this is different from the usual hypothesis rule of ordinary logic, Γ,AA, because the sole allowed resource is the goal A, which must be present; thus consumed exactly once.)

Dual to the hypothesis rule is a substitution principle that describes how to chain a judgment concluding A with a judgment having a linear resource A.

substitution principle

If ΔA and Δ,AC, then Δ,ΔC.

The notation Δ,Δ denotes multiset union.

Logical connectives

The connectives of ILL are of two major kinds: multiplicative and additive. Let us visit them in sequence.

Multiplicative conjunction

ΔAΔBΔ,ΔABIΔABΔ,A,BCΔ,ΔCE

Multiplicative implication

I'll use to denote this connective, though the traditional glyph is \multimap.

Δ,ABΔABIΔABΔAΔ,ΔBE

Multiplicative disjunction

Multiplicative disjuntion or par is impossible in ILL.

Next the additive connectives.

Additive conjunction

I had to stop here because I can't for the life of me get the ampersand to work inside <math>. Time to upload images.

--Kaustuv Chaudhuri 07:22, 31 May 2004 (UTC)Reply