Talk:Interstate 694

History

I have some problems with the 2nd paragraph under history. First, and pedantically, MN-252 has never been US 52. At the time of completion of I-94, it was already MN-252 and before that it was US 169 (on a different alignment). The main problem is that there is no citation for this notion that "694 was never intended to be a full beltway". There is just no evidence for this and while there were indeed "TO" trailblazer signs I think they were there prior to the construction to full interstate standards.

I think this whole paragraph should be removed (likewise with the same paragraph in the I-494 article). Canth1 (talk) 16:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Absent any comment I went ahead and removed the offending paragraph.Canth1 (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Why are factual items removed from this acticle. I have three times added information that is deleted. Even proving appropriate citations canth1 still removes pertinent information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.143.125 (talk) 02:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 694. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120914220734/http://www.dot.state.mn.us/roadway/data/reports/logpoint/statelpt.pdf to http://www.dot.state.mn.us/roadway/data/reports/logpoint/statelpt.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Direction and Terminuses

Should the Terminuses be changed to "Counterclockwise end" and "Clockwise end"? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)