Talk:Interstate 59

Untitled comments

Please note that the closing paragraph of this article seems to stray from NPOV... --Robertb-dc 23:31, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Furthermore, this final paragraph was ripped from from a interstate highway reference page (http://www.ihoz.com/I59.html). The reason it sounds biased is because it was meant as a rebuttal to the insinuation that Interstate 59 is useless.

External links

I'd like to know exactly how adding a link to a valid, well-researched page counts as "spam." I really ought not have to encounter such a fight to add relevant information to Wikipedia. --Larrysphatpage 07:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

It is clearly a link normally to be avoided: "A website that you own or maintain, even if the guidelines above imply that it should be linked to. This is because of neutrality and point-of-view concerns; neutrality is an important objective at Wikipedia, and a difficult one. If it is relevant and informative, mention it on the talk page and let other — neutral — Wikipedia editors decide whether to add the link." —C.Fred (talk) 21:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 59. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060218010013/http://www.dot.state.ga.us/DOT/plan-prog/transportation_data/400reports/2003/dpp438_2003.pdf to http://www.dot.state.ga.us/DOT/plan-prog/transportation_data/400reports/2003/dpp438_2003.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)