Talk:Interstate 294

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 22 October 2020 by Cilabsuhsk in topic New Route Description
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shell

Untitled comments

Proposed interchange on I-294 and I-57?

In 1999, authorities had a proposal of building an interchange on Interstate 294. do explain please...

Should be addressed. ---Rob 18:10, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The northern end of Interstate 294 is IN Deerfield, not Northbrook. Someone should correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.30.5 (talk) 05:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge or not?

Should we merge this article with Tri-State Tollway; or keep it as a seperate page. I'm weakly opposing on merge because it has its own history to keep as a seperate page.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 20:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Interstate 294

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Interstate 294's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "tollwaymap":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:31, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Yes check.svg Done Orphan refs fixed. BryanG (talk) 22:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Berkeley

I-294 does not hit US 20 in Berkeley. I think rather that it's Northlake. Someone should correct that. 99.56.13.119 (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 294. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

New Route Description

Yes, there is a expanded route description, however, there are no references. Without any refereneces, it won't count as expansion. Thanks to @Imzadi1979 for corrections.

Cilabsuhsk (talk) 03:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply