Talk:International Chemical Identifier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 28 February by Pythonik in topic InChI generator at Cambridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shell

Incomplete Specification

It appears that there is no actual specification of InChi which is actually complete. All appears to be centered around the software that does it. The IUPAC site distributes software, in it there is a technical document, but it is not complete. Journal articles and presentations only talk about InChi and its layers but not precisely how the most important layer works: the connectivity layer. This information should be found somewhere and referenced. BTW, some links here are broken. Gschadow (talk) 15:39, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Found one source http://depth-first.com/articles/2006/08/12/inchi-canonicalization-algorithm/ and figures the connection layer out myself. Gschadow (talk) 04:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

InChI generator at Cambridge

The external links to Cambridge U. appear to be dead, is this temporary? V8rik 21:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

So you think a direct link to the projects demo page would be beneficial here? There, you already have a .mol/.sdf ready for an upload, or sketch the structure from scratch and then generate the InChI locally (i.e., after loading the application, all data processing is in the web browser / nothing leaves your computer). Pythonik (talk) 13:49, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

We have upgraded our server. It is working now Petermr 11:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Long InChIs

Many InChIs are too long to fit on a page. Some browsers (e.g. Firefox) will distort the layout if they are inline whereas others will wrap/break in the middle.

InChIs cannot be broken, so I suspect the best strategy in WP is to use a new paragraph to display the InChI and to position it where it isn't immediately after a float (image). Petermr 11:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merge

Proposed merge (in response to my previous PROD) of InChI Trust to International Chemical Identifier by User:Edgar181.

Nomination for deletion of Template:InChI

File:Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:InChI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Readable?

Methinks the word "human-readable" in the lede is a bit overenthousiastic. After the opening line already said "textual", it could be just 'linear text code' or 'alphabetical' or so. -DePiep (talk) 19:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Chemical Identifier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on International Chemical Identifier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Further details missing

Currently, the site does not include how to actually read such an InChI. While the chemical formula is straightforward, already the connection layer is more complicated and could use a little extra explanation. I understand that InChI is not meant to be (overly) human readable, but a little more details would certainly help here. Martinalex000 (talk) 15:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply