Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 June by Szmenderowiecki in topic Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 May 2025
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:Article history Template:Contentious topics/talk notice Template:English variant notice Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Top 25 report Template:Annual readership User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn User:MiszaBot/config

  1. REDIRECT Template:Archives

Template:Rcat shell


Results column to reflect Same Results as in the respective Main article

Template:Side box

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


{{#section-h:Talk:List of wars involving Pakistan|Results column to reflect Same Results as in the respective Main article}}

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

j

in short India will win against Pakistan as they have better military and economy. India also has more and better ties as they have good ties with Russia, USA and Israel who will support them while Pakistan only have China and Bangladesh on their side. Even though China could do some good damage their economy has been down due to the 245% tariffs USA put on them.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 March 2025

Template:Edit extended-protected Please add Template:India topics, Template:Afghanistan topics, and Template:Pakistan topics to the end of the page: Template:Navbox with collapsible groups Template:Afghanistan topics Script error: No such module "Navbox with collapsible groups". Agowa (talk) 18:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Yes check.svg Done Lova Falk (talk) 12:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 April 2025

Template:Edit extended-protected Please replace the current mention of the "2025 India–Pakistan standoff" with the following:

2025 India–Pakistan standoff: The crisis began on 22 April 2025, following a deadly militant attack in the Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir. The attack resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians, including 25 Indian tourists and one local resident, with over 20 others injured. The Resistance Front (TRF), a group suspected of links to the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba—designated a terrorist organization by the United Nations—initially claimed responsibility but later retracted the statement.[1]

In the aftermath, India accused Pakistan of harboring groups responsible for cross-border militancy and announced a series of measures including the expulsion of Pakistani diplomats, suspension of visas, closure of border crossings, and a temporary withdrawal from the Indus Waters Treaty.[2] Pakistan denied any involvement and described India’s allegations as politically motivated. In response, Pakistan introduced reciprocal measures, including restrictions on trade, closure of its airspace and land borders, and suspension of the Shimla Agreement.[3]

Both governments issued travel advisories warning their citizens against travel to each other’s territories. India’s Cabinet Committee on Security urged Indian nationals in Pakistan to return, while Pakistan’s foreign ministry issued similar guidance for its citizens in India.[4]

Reason for change: The current version of the article includes language and framing that could be perceived as unbalanced, assigning blame to one side. The revised version presents events using neutral terminology, reflects both nations' perspectives and actions equally, and includes citations from reputable international news sources. This ensures compliance with Wikipedia’s WP:NPOV (neutral point of view) and WP:RS (reliable sources) policies.

Thank you. Doanld12312 (talk) 20:23, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Not done: Stale, outdated and also, as currently worded, I see no issues with neutrality. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 14:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

inovlement of other states

if i say that in this the main involvement of other so what you said about it 2402:E000:546:1D11:DAD:E981:4A68:E95B (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

This War Will Not Be Fought By Both States

One of the major resson is the investing of the core states in the both states either pakistan or india. Recently pakistan goverment invite to invester to invest in pakistan and pakistan never goes to war if the unfortunatly the india attack the pakistan then pakistan immidiatly response the india of its attack. 2402:E000:546:1D11:DAD:E981:4A68:E95B (talk) 14:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2025

Template:Edit extended-protected Typo: Skirmishes, incidents and standoffs > 2025 India–Pakistan standoff:

 from: "... India's actions by with trade restrictions, ..."  
 to: "... India's actions with trade restrictions, ..." Thatusername96 (talk) 02:28, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Template:Already done HudecEmil (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 7 May 2025 (2)

Template:Edit extended-protected Change 'and withdrawal from the Indus Waters Treaty' to withdrew from the Indus Waters Treaty, to make it grammatically correct. Gorkhor (talk) 15:50, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Yes check.svg Done HudecEmil (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Bharat got hit by the terror attack in Pahlgam, and to cover its failure, Bharat attacked nine holy places in Pakistan, claiming to be terror sites and killing 31 civilians, including kids and women. These places were mosques and religious schools. In response to that, Pakistan downed five fighter jets of Bharat, including three Rafale. Again, Bharat failed to defend itself and launched several drones at Pakistan's different cities, targeting civilians. On 10th May night, Bharat tried to attack three military bases in Pakistan and ultimately, Pakistan had to retaliate and responded so fiercely that it attacked 26 air bases and military sites in Bharat. Pakistan did not attack civilians like Bharat did. In Pakistan's attack, Bharat's defense system, including S-400, was destroyed and Bharat has to beg the USA to opt for a ceasefire.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 May 2025

Template:Edit extended-protected Update last bullet in Skirmishes, incidents and standoffs. See Recent Developments.

Also, add link for 2025 Pahalgam attack in the text for context when the terrorist attack is mentioned. 14.139.128.52 (talk) 03:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Update and add the entire topic of 2025 India–Pakistan strikes in brief. 14.139.128.52 (talk) 03:46, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Already done Szmenderowiecki (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 May 2025

Template:Edit extended-protected The map of India is incorrect . 2409:40C2:601D:63AC:C4A4:FDFF:FE6B:33D2 (talk) 04:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Not done: It's unclear what kind of edit the User is requesting. Please be more specific and informative. Don't forget to include a citation. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 04:34, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 May 2025 (2)

Template:Edit extended-protected Change "India then expelled Pakistani diplomats and called back its diplomats, suspended visas, closed borders, and withdrew from the Indus Waters Treaty." to "India then expelled Pakistani diplomats and called back its diplomats, suspended visas, closed borders, and put the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance"

[5] Raijai883 (talk) 16:44, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've changed the word from "withdrew" to "suspended" as I decided that saying "and put the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance" is a bit too wordy. Contest if you disagree. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 17:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Ref-talk

I feel like the current situation should be in skirmishes as opposed to conflicts

No ground conflict 2600:1008:A131:9966:682B:5536:F859:C499 (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 May 2025

Template:Edit extended-protected


  • Why it should be changed:

    The link to Tashkent Declaration in the phrase "...and played a pivotal role in negotiating the peace agreement between India and Pakistan." is currently on "pivotal role"; it should be on either "peace agreement" or "peace agreement between India and Pakistan", as the article is about the agreement itself rather than, specifically, the Soviet Union's role in it. The proposed edit also changes the linked article from "Agreement" to "Declaration", given that the former is a redirect to the latter. (note: I previously requested this without the edit-request template, but it received no response.

LordArtemis (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Yes check.svg Done - I've changed the link from one word to the recommended word. Thank you for helping out. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 19:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".