Talk:Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 February 2024 by Akersraju11 in topic Garbage
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Reliable sources for medical articles

Clinical trials

ICD vs. Antiarrhythmics

Trials that show that ICDs are superior to antiarrhythmic therapy:

  • The Dutch Trial
  • AVID
  • Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH)
  • Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS)
  • MUSTT
  • MADIT I
  • MADIT II
  • SCD-HeFT

Image scale?

What is the scale of the ruler in the image? The "West Germany" label on the tape makes me think it's cm, but the fact that it's divided into half, quarter, and eighth divisions makes me think it's inches. Which is right? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Its in inches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.42.154.35 (talk) 23:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

EMI/RFI effects

My father experienced nauseating effects when he was near tractors and lawnmowers, and eventually concluded that it was his implanted defribrillator's sensitivity to electromagnetic interference (EMI). The effects can be mitigated by using simple shielding, such as by a sheet of aluminum foil covering the device. It would be nice to have some citations on this effect, but I haven't been able to find any yet. — Loadmaster (talk) 01:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Most implanted devices are already screened. The problem is the long leads into the heart.

So unless you want to wear a foil vest, you are wasting your time with foil. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.249.187 (talk) 19:43, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

References (in general and References section)

I just assessed this article and believe it might barely meet C criteria, though others are free to downgrade it to start class if necessary, but I felt that the content was more than worthwhile to justify C class. More references are needed, and the References section needs to be cleaned up. I might even just take a moment now to do that... Adavis444 (talk) 06:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Okay, so now there is a Notes section that contains all of the footnotes, and there is a References section, containing sources of general information I suppose, somewhat akin to Wikipedia:Citing sources#Shortened footnotes. Each reference in this References section should probably be matched to the information that it is citing in order to achieve greater consistency, better referencing of individual facts, and a consistent Wikipedia system, and this must happen before this article could reach B class. Adavis444 (talk) 06:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Citations needed tag on QOL section

Just looking through the article and wonder if the citations needed tag on the quality of life section is still warranted. Two of the three paragraphs are heavily sourced (almost too-much-so). I think I have seen studies related to physical activities if those few sentences require some support. Thoughts?Cknoepke (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Therapeutic Approaches of ICD shocks

doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.428 JFW | T@lk 21:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Subgroups

On the whole, ICDs have a proven mortality benefit. Unfortunately the studies were underpowered to say in which subgroup the benefit was most significant. Ann Intern Med doi:10.7326/M13-1787 JFW | T@lk 14:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Garbage

Huge sections of this article are unreferenced.

Worse still, huge parts of it are just plain wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.191.209 (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, hello Everyone that had been involved in this article. I am working in a remote course on Wikipedia for medical professionals. I will be updating this article over the next few weeks. I was wondering if anyone knew of newer studies or techniques that they believe should be referenced? Akersraju11 (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lives saved in primary prevention

doi:10.7326/M17-0120 JFW | T@lk 22:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor

Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment

— Assignment last updated by Akersraju11 (talk) 02:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply