Talk:Imperial Regalia
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imperial Regalia Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Interwiki copy
Laws
good golly Ms. Dolly... can someone please help me out with this page maybe? I translated most of the text from the German version (this is completely legal, right?) if not i apologise. but i don´t have enough time right now to do this alone.... cheers!
User:antares911 15:10, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Disambiguation?
Should this instead be a disambiguation page for Imperial Regalia of Japan and Imperial Regalia of the Holy Roman Empire? Nik42 04:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Err...Japan was not part of the Holy Roman Empire, no matter how much any Japanese person may have wished it to be so. Now, during WW II there was a certain...uh, relationship that existed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.111.118.28 (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Sword of Charlemagne
The 'Saber of Charlemagne' misdirects to 'Joyeuse' which is the French coronation sword (note the painting of Louis XIV wearing it) and has never been a part of the Imperial Regalia. Joyeuse is a broadsword and the Saber of Charlemagne is a saber, very early, probably of 10th or 11th century Magyar origin. It's origin is unknown; possibly a gift from one of the Arpads to one of the Saxon or Salian emperors.67.52.199.50 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC).
- You are right. Another editor has created an article that belongs to them. The links have changed. Thank you! Tri-l (talk) 15:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)