Talk:Immigration
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Immigration Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config
split Economic effects section
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to split with 1 support Cognsci (talk) 12:09, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
request to split Economic effects section into Economic effects of immigration (which is currently a redirect to this section) to aid in reducing length which is 9516 words Cognsci (talk) 12:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Support HudecEmil (talk) 14:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Constant conflation of race with immigration status
Whoever compiled the information about the US under the "Integration" section does not seem to understand the difference between racism and anti-immigrant sentiment. As written, there's very little in the cited examples that can be traced back to anti-immigrant feeling. Racism against Black Americans is obviously unfortunate, but not particularly relevant to this article, as they generally aren't seen by the American public as immigrants. Ereb0r (talk) 01:17, 18 June 2025 (UTC)