Talk:Immaculate Conception
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Immaculate Conception Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:On this day Template:Copied
rescued material
While for some early theologians original sin was the consequence of Adam's act, for others it was Eve who was to blame, Irenaeus (born c.130) writing that "disobedient Eve" became "the cause of death, both for herself and the entire human race", and Ambrose (c.340-397) that Eve deceived Adam, while Origen (184-235) drew the lesson for all womankind: "God does not stoop to look upon what is feminine and of the flesh."
Lumen Gentium n. 56
Why the Lumen Gentium is not considered to be related to the previous topic?? It is relevant to say that not only the Council of Trent, but also the Church Fathers affirmed the preservation of the Virgin Mary from all stain of sin.
Template:Quote 176.200.140.47 (talk) 07:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Ping: Why Lumen Gentium is considered a "bias source"?
About the creation of the Gospel of James
I don't see how is related the history about the alleged creation of the Gospel of James with the Immaculate Conception. The important thing is to show what the Gospel of James says, the rest does not belong to this article but to the main article. Or maybe I'm wrong? --Rafaelosornio (talk) 03:34, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Reinserted content
I have Template:Diff2 a new set of content from the article that is poorly written and contains both original research and POV issues. It presents Catholic teaching as presented in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (not even the doctrinal pronouncements) as fact. No content- or policy-based rationale was provided for its reinsertion. Ignoring the actual content for a moment, if it is reinserted, I'd encourage swapping out the links to the parish website for the more stable Cite CCC format. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Means And Methods
Did Gabriel have a massive syringe? I’m wondering if this is the first case of artificial insemination and maybe we should indicate so. Angel-gabriels-blessedartthoughamongwomen-syringe (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- At the risk of appearing to take this seriously, there are no reliable sources that I am aware of that discuss this. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)