Talk:ING Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 April by Furkanberk52 in topic Further Acqusitions part
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Merged-from Template:WikiProject banner shell

Orphaned references in ING Group

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of ING Group's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AR2019":

  • From Ackermans & van Haaren: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Swiss Re: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Iberdrola: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From BASF: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Australia and New Zealand Banking Group: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Daimler AG: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From ASM International: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Bayer: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Hannover Re: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Inditex: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Vinci SA: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From BMW: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Allianz: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Aegon N.V.: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Bankinter: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Repsol: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • From Deutsche Börse: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 00:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Naming Redundancy

ING Group stands for International Netherlands Group Group. The second "Group" is redundant. ING's own website doesn't use the term "ING Group. Should the page not be renamed? 122.148.227.2 (talk) 07:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

For purposes of customer communication, indeed they call themselves ING only. However, the official name of the main company is ING Groep N.V.. They use ING Group also when in the same document they want to refer to one or more of the local country units. Jopimo (talk) 11:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of ING Belgium into ING Group

It would be more consistent if it was merge the same way as Australia is under divisions? Birdie2912 (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Template:Merge done Klbrain (talk) 10:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Additional information needed for ING Spain

ING Spain is missing in the list of branches. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Internetyev (talkcontribs) 15:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply


Stub, unless expanded can be covered in the main article. MB 15:38, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Broken link for the source showing ING pulled out of F1

The link (http://www.ing.com/group/showdoc.jsp?docid=412817_EN) used to show that ING pulled out of F1 is dead and just redirects to the home page Zak1388 (talk) 10:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Further Acqusitions part

You should add Oyakbank in that list too, which transformed into ING Türkiye. asperagasmanchini (talk) 09:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply