Talk:Hurricane Fefa
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Fefa Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
B class
I upped it to B. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 22:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
GA!
As you hurricane guys/gals always do, you've created an excellent article. This one, in particular, certainly meets all of the requirements of WP:WIAGA. My only suggestions would be to explain the path shown in Image:Fefa 1991 track.png- that is, which direction was the hurricane travelling (even if this seems obvious) and what the different colors mean- and, as should always be done for every article, do another copyedit. Otherwise, the article is superb. -- Kicking222 19:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Moved back to Hurricane Fefa
I know it appears that NHC simply replaced and it seems only speculation that the name Fefa was retired. I have moved the article from Hurricane Fefa (1991) back to "Hurricane Fefa", because now there is proof that the name Fefa was retired, and not simply replaced. See here for the list of retired Atlantic and East Pacific names.--12george1 (talk) 17:16, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
- I wouldn't consider that list proof of anything. It also includes Knut, which was a fish storm and didn't do anything (appears to have been simply replaced). --Hurricanehink (talk) 19:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Fefa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205060537/http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/luceneweb/caption_direct.jsp?photoId=STS043-74-005 to http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/luceneweb/caption_direct.jsp?photoId=STS043-74-005
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/tcp/documents/TCP30_Edition2012.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)