Talk:Hudson Volcano

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 January 2025 by Jo-Jo Eumerus in topic The Archaeology of the Pampas and Patagonia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:ArticleHistory Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Refideas

Template:Refideas Template:Old move

Aerosols

From what I understand, sulfur dioxide is a gas and as such can not be an aerosol. If this is true, the phrase "sulfur dioxide and other aerosols" suggests the wrong thing. 21:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Not only is it a gas; I'm not sure it is particularly soluble in water, nor can it turn into sulphuric acid without a lot of laboratory work. (No that that error was made in this article) Furthermore it is unwise to speculate on the properties of any chemical affect on the ozone after a volcanic eruption until we know more about the process. (I gather an increase in the water content during the SSW (that I believe always occur with eruptions) merely adds to the scarcity of ozone at the poles in the season. Measurement was extremely suspect at that time and certainly any comparison with data until the 1983 satellite data fiasco was resolved can not be accepted.

Weatherlawyer (talk) 20:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hudson

Who was the Hudson for which the volcano was named? --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Francisco Hudson.. Dentren | Talk 15:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Hudson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

On the 1991 eruption

I've compiled sources that can be used to write an article on the 1991 eruption[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10106049209354367 ][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], but in this article I've minimized the coverage as the article is about the volcano in general not just its historic eruptions. And the H1 eruption in the Holocene probably was far more significant than the 1991 one, anyway. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Going to ask for second opinions on this POV balance tomorrow. JoJo Eumerus mobile (main talk) 21:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Given that this article is about the volcano in general and that it has 4,000+ words of readable prose I would suggest creating a separate article for the 1991 eruption. I also think expanding the content about the 1991 eruption in this article might meet WP:UNDUE since there have been more significant eruptions at Mount Hudson earlier in the Holocene. Volcanoguy 20:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Agree with Volcanoguy. ceranthor 21:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

For H1 eruption

"CARLOS ASCHERO; DAMIAN BOZZUTO; MARÍA TERESA CIVALERO; MARIANA DE NIGRIS; NATALIA FERNÁNDEZ; NICOLAS MAVEROFF; MARIANA SACCHI Se nos viene la noche. el volcán Hudson y su influencia en el NO de Santa Cruz: integrando perspectivas arqueológicas. Arqueología de la Patagonia: el pasado en las arenas. Lugar: Puerto Madryn; Año: 2019; p. 239 - 249" is accessible via ResearchGate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Outdated source on appearance

"Cevo C., J. (1). MANIFESTACIONES VOLCANICAS EN AYSEN (CHILE) ENTRE 1971 Y 1973. Revista Geográfica De América Central, 1(1), 51-74. Recuperado a partir de https://www.revistas.una.ac.cr/index.php/geografica/article/view/2053" may be useful to describe an outdated view on how the volcano looks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA

Talk:Mount Hudson/GA1

Did you know nomination

Template:Did you know nominations/Mount Hudson

Requested move 16 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. to Hudson Volcano. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 16:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


Mount Hudson → ? – Template:Bcc As noted in the featured article candidacy, "Mount Hudson" doesn't appear to be the most common name for the volcano. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)— Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 09:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Polyamorph (talk) 10:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, you were the person who stated that in the FAC. There was certainly no agreement about it. However, I agree that User:Hog Farm indicated that the question of whether or not to move it should be resolved after the close of the FAC, so why don't you present your reasons why you think it ought to be moved? For example, what do the most authoritative sources say? -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Global Volcanism Program has "Cerro Hudson". Google Scholar for Cerro Hudson, Mount Hudson and Mt Hudson but with lots of false positives. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Based on what I looked over during the FAC, either Hudson Volcano or Cerro Hudson seem preferable to the present title; "Mount Hudson" has much less usage than those two, even in the sources cited in the article. Hog Farm Talk 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Relisting comment: There appears to be agreement for a move, but to what title? Polyamorph (talk) 10:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pronunciation

How is it pronounced? Like the river in New York? Marnanel (talk) 10:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

No idea, sorry. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Preprints

This source may be useful if it gets published.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Archaeology of the Pampas and Patagonia

This source might be incorporated here, but I ran into a major issue with this paragraph: Template:Tq I don't get what this is trying to say especially with respect to "organizational perspective", and the fact that Zangrando reference is wrong doesn't help. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:18, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply