Talk:Hubble sequence
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hubble sequence Script error: No such module "pagetype".. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Message box".
New Hubble Scheme
I found another Hubble chart that might look more interesting on the site. -- Hurricane Devon (Talk), September 20, 2005
- Well, in my highly biased (I made the old graphic) opinion: I like the idea of having images of real galaxies on the chart, but I think his schematics are not very good. I tried to convey realistic shapes and differentiate between the bulge, bar and arms using color. Anyway, the image could definitely stand some improvement, so maybe there's an even better compromise. -- Xerxes 23:40, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
- NASA Pub. EG-2000-08-003-GSFC: Hubble Fork Diagram. --Ryanrs 00:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Sites should be merged. Same exact topic, and many users would benefit from consolidation of info. for research purposes.----sjenkins
Re-write and move from galaxy morphological classification
After a major re-write, the Hubble sequence was getting too long to be just a section of the main article, so I moved it back here and left a summary under galaxy morphological classification. See the discussion here. Cosmo0 15:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Date
The original article gave the date of Hubble's publication of his scheme as 1925. All the references I've seen attribute it to his 1936 book "Realm of the Nebulae", so that's what I've put. If anyone knows of an earlier reference, please update it in the article. Cosmo0 13:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hubble sequence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121205083205/http://sings.stsci.edu/Publications/sings_poster.html to http://sings.stsci.edu/Publications/sings_poster.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Diagram
The reference for the diagram should be James Jeans (1928), Astronomy and Cosmogony, page 332). Originally the diagram is rotated by 90 degrees. Hobbema (talk) 12:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)