Talk:Hornfels

Untitled

Moved article back to correct name from hornfel, previous move was in error. Hornfels is the correct and widely used term - it is the singular form (read the article). Vsmith 03:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Non-foliated

Isn't hornfels non-foliated? In the picture it looks like it is foliated... -- Annonymus User 1000 (talk) 10:50, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Hornfels are unlikely to be foliated, but what we're seeing in the image is primary lithological banding - the pale layers were sandstones and the dark layers shales. I've expanded the description of the image - I hope that helps. Mikenorton (talk) 12:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hornfels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160809173935/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUFv4rbBkhg to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUFv4rbBkhg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)