Talk:Hoover Dam
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hoover Dam Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:Article history Template:WikiProject banner shell User:MiszaBot/config
Problem with the dam's Power/Energy specifications
I was looking at the specs for Hoover Dam and spotted something strange ...
Installed capacity 2,080 MW
Capacity factor 23%
Annual generation 3.3 TWh (12 PJ) (2020) [3]
But 12 PJ divided by seconds in a year is 380 GW, not 2 GW. I don't know where the error entered the stream, but 12 PJ is definitely not consistent with 2.08 GW as the installed capacity rating. YodaWhat (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- I would suggest removing any erroneous figures.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
2022 explosion
Template:Re the consensus was to merge it. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Hoover Dam explosion. We have to put at least a line down for a merge to be done. Iamreallygoodatcheckerst@lk 22:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- The closing administrator found consensus to merge but then it becomes up to the editors of the involved articles to decide if there's useful content to merge. See WP:MERGE. There's no useful content to merge. Two different editors have reverted additions on this.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Absolutely insignificant, a huge waste of time, and an object lesson in letting at least 45 minutes pass before creating a new article based on a fire engine out on a routine call. Look at all the editor and admin time that could have been used on something constructive instead of cleanup. SPECIFICO talk 23:26, 27 July 2022
"2022 Hoover Dam exposion" listed at Redirects for discussion
File:Information.svg An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2022 Hoover Dam exposion and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#2022 Hoover Dam exposion until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Hoover Dam Café
menu as of March 2025
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10THu1giqGlaihY8_sErGIbswvvlTmwVV/view?pli=1 98.97.137.241 (talk) 05:48, 26 March 2025 (UTC)