Talk:History of the Cossacks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 May by 47.229.144.239 in topic Spelling of Zaporozhan
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:WikiProject banner shell User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThisTemplate:Archives

Statements and Citations

It seems that most of the "Early History" section was written by one author and one or two references. I have put citation tags for at least a month on many paragraphs, and none have been added. I tried to find some, but could not, probably because the citations are the only sources that state the given information. If there are no objections, I will re-write the early sections, with more in-line citations. Thanks, Horlo (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Cossacs" (Kozaki) were Slavs

Kozaki were and are Slavs. Stop with occultism. The term derives from the "goat-ers". Why are "historians" and "Linguists" always stealing slavic elements, cultural, mythological characters and proclaiming them as "non slavic"? Even Perun was proclaimed as "non Slavic"

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the Cossacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Gothic origins

Template:Replyto is attempting to add information on the gothic background of the cossacks. He is, I believe, attempting to use "Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"." as his reference. I opened this section so we could discuss it here.---- Work permit (talk) 17:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I believe you are correct as to the paper the user is referencing. I also agree that you are correct in reverting the additions: the content contended to be there simply isn't there. Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
I even offered to help on the user talk page User_talk:Trevoorijk. I filled out a citation and asked for the page numbers to complete it. The editor was never been heard from again, never made another contribution.---- Work permit (talk) 01:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Spelling of Zaporozhan

At the beginning of the Polish Lithuanian commonwealth part Zaporozhian is spelled Zaporijan. Lets standardise the spelling, Zaporozhian is an appropriate and commonly used spelling of the word thus all other instances should be changed to Zaporozhian (and Zaporizhzhia) 47.229.144.239 (talk) 23:54, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply