Talk:Hassan Nasrallah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 June 2025 by 2600:382:2400:1702:A0F5:BE3B:C176:8503 in topic Politicide perpetrators
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:ARBPIA Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Top 25 Report User:MiszaBot/config

Early life and education

Actaully he is born on 28/11/1959 And he is the first among his siblings not the ninth 94.187.17.135 (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Western-centric article written at least in part by people who can't even read Arabic

This is the sort of article that gives Wikipedia a bad name. You have 117 references and three-quarters must be Western sources including such infamous propaganda outlets as MEMRI and CAMERA. There seem to be about two sources written in Arabic. Just how many of your privileged writers permitted to contribute to articles on the 'Middle East' have at least a working knowledge of Arabic?

This is clearly inadequate guys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kombo the mzungu (talkcontribs) 08:43, 25 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Holocaust Denial

I see that Nasrallah was removed from the Holocaust denial category. I found these sources that note he praised Holocaust deniers, and one from the Jerusalem Post that called him a denier himself.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/sep/29/hassan-nasrallah-obituary

https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/french-cartoon-row-islamic-leaders-push-holocaust-denial-in-response-647649

Is this a valid source regarding Nasrallah? JPHC2003 (talk) 03:20, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

"The Jerusalem Post is generally reliable but should be treated with caution when making extraordinary claims regarding the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. It should be used as a source for the Israeli–Palestinian conflict only to cite basic facts or if its reporting is validated by additional reporting from another source not similarly limited."WP:RSP I would not count this as a basic fact and the page is tagged as contentious topic on PIA. Czarking0 (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Politicide perpetrators

Would the category Politicide perpetrators be appropriate here? 2600:382:2400:1702:A0F5:BE3B:C176:8503 (talk) 23:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply