Talk:Harry Duynhoven

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 31 July 2024 by *frijōndz in topic Loss of seat
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Untitled

It was *not* an Electoral "Regulation"(which would come from the Executive) but rather was a breach of S55(1) of the Electoral Act 1993, a statute (from the legislature).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry Duynhoven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Loss of seat

There is no doubt that Duynhoven lost his seat in 2003 as a result of applying for Dutch citizenship. The Solicitor Generals opinion is clear. It is only Labor Party partisans who suggest otherwise. I have tried to tidy up the article - which was clearly written by Labour Party supporters.203.80.61.102 (talk) 04:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Citation Needed
Due to a conflict I am unable to edit this article. However, I can provide two citations about the Act which was passed, it was the Electoral (Vacancies) Amendment Act 2003 (itself a citation). Additionally there is the following article on the topic:
Waldron, J --- "Retroactive Law: How Dodgy was Duynhoven?" [2004] OtaLawRw 8; (2004) 10 Otago Law Review 631. *frijōndz (talk) 04:52, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply