Talk:HMS Liverpool (C11)
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Liverpool (C11) Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:ArticleHistory Template:WikiProject banner shell
Query
Query: according to my father (Norman Gomersall, who was on board from 1939) Liverpool was used to transfer major gold reserves to America (Mare Island Navy Yard) and the ship was repaired there, not in Rosyth. The crew did not remain while repairs happened; it was sent to New York by train (before America entered the war - the crew were transported across country in secret) and from there were repatriated to England. My father is now dead - anyone around who knows any more about this? (originally posted by anon 212.44.22.39)
I have recently found photographs of various ships at sea my uncle took as he was serving in the war, HMS Liverpool is one of them. The photos really are a wonderful insight. If these photographs would be useful, please let me know, and I will upload them. Thanks! Cissmiace (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- More images would be very helpful. Please feel free to upload them, and any other pictures of ships. Benea (talk) 07:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Consideration of modernisation of HMS LIverpool 1952-53.
As the two largest towns the HMS Belfast and Liverpool were in some ways considered the cruisers most capable of modernisation in the early 1950s even thought they were both more than ten years old. Their larger hulls could have accomodated three of the new twin fully automatic 6 inch Mk 26 guns being tested on HMS Cumberland were none of the war completed Colony class cruisers had enough space, stability or internal volume and the HMS Superb could only have carried two of the new mounts. The percieved perception that the Liverpool was more suitable for modernisation was one of the reason it and Belfast were laid up in 1952-3, the RN having run into the ground its best ageing cruisers of the County class in the late 1940s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.102.108.37 (talk) 07:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Liverpool (C11). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131030114901/http://www.olympic-museum.de/torches/torch1948.htm to http://olympic-museum.de/torches/torch1948.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Specifications
I've switched the beam and other stats to feet and inches rather than decimal feet in the infobox and will do the same for the main body using Raven & Roberts.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)