Talk:Gulf Stream
Script error: No such module "Message box".
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />Script error: No such module "Message box".
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gulf Stream Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:ArticleHistory Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Message box". Template:Copied Template:Annual readership User:MiszaBot/config
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
File:Sciences humaines.svg This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 3 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Angerine01.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
"there is consensus"
The heading of the article claims that there is consensus about the gulf stream and then doesn't provide a single citation for that claim. Claiming consensus feels a bit bold, but doing it without *any* citations seems like a huge mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CD01:F090:79CF:65B7:823A:16D1 (talk) 01:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Guardian: Climate crisis, Scientists spot warning signs of Gulf Stream collapse
I'm unsure how to include this in the article but seems very important, please can someone check it and include?
Thanks
John Cummings (talk) 16:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to Another recent study found that the Gulf Stream may collapse in less than a decade, possibly as early as 2025. Jarble (talk) 19:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Suggestion to remove "renewable power generation" section
The Gulf Stream's potential for renewable power generation is not significant enough to warrant its own section in this article, at least not at this point in time. The articles cited in this section are academically interesting (primarily the Yang et al. (2013) paper, none of the other references add much beyond this) but there is no significant/large-scale project underway to exploit the Gulf Stream as an energy source. A layperson reading this article may leave with the impression that this is a serious undertaking, when this is not the case. Scleractinian (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- deleted Chidgk1 (talk) 12:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gulf Stream/1}}
AMOC article says AMOC shutdown will cool British Isles
This article suggests it won’t. Doug Weller talk 20:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)