Talk:Green Bullfrog
Template:ArticleHistoryScript error: No such module "Banner shell".
Untitled
The Green Bullfrog album has a Motown feel with an open jam-like atmosphere. Performances are high spirited, mostly up tempo, especially the hot closer "Bullfrog", where musicians take turns at ripping out some pretty tasty solos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.179.227.33 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 9 December 2004 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 01:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Green Bullfrog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/611GioqCO?url=http://www.blackmoresnight.com/moon_castle_pages/blackmore_discography.htm to http://www.blackmoresnight.com/moon_castle_pages/blackmore_discography.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
Template:Did you know nominations/Green Bullfrog
Quick questions
Hi Ritchie333, Two quick questions please because I don't have access to refs. Is the date for 3rd recording session 4 or 7 January? Is the 1980 re-release more simply named Green Frog, or is that a typo? Thanks, JennyOz (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- JennyOz, Checked my CD liner notes, it's definitely 4 January 1971 according to that. The 1980 reissue, which I also have has "Natural Magic (TM)" on the LP spine and the label, but I don't think that's part of the title. Green Frog was added by this edit, which wasn't me and there's never been an album called that. I am concerned the GA review did not pick up on these factual errors, but since the sources are all offline and I'm probably the only editor who has them sitting twelve feet away from a computer terminal, I'll take the blame for this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:14, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying Ritchie333. I'm going to see if I can find and listen. With such an assembly, it can't be too bad. JennyOz (talk) 13:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- JennyOz, It's a great album, incredibly obscure, but I've been listening to it on and off for over 30 years, never getting tired of it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ritchie333, you're right, it's great! Thanks for the introduction. JennyOz (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- JennyOz, It's a great album, incredibly obscure, but I've been listening to it on and off for over 30 years, never getting tired of it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying Ritchie333. I'm going to see if I can find and listen. With such an assembly, it can't be too bad. JennyOz (talk) 13:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)